Originally Posted by
Oaky
Is it fair, that clans have to be dead in order to become legendary?
No, it's not, and I see no logical reason why one would advocate anything else.
Let's take, for example, [T]. If we compare when [T] was alive to now (when it's dead and legendary), the clan sports the same achievements at both times. Why is the clan considered any more "legendary" now that it's dead? It doesn't make any sense.