Originally Posted by
Erth
The more I read on it the more I'm torn on the issue, and I hope you see my dilema.
On the one hand, if a clan has over 50% of its members totally dead, that clan clearly can't be considered as active as a clan like evo, whereby a lot of their older members still play and get involved. I don't think anyone is arguing that.
On the other hand, I totally understand the sentiment of not wanting to kick oldies from the clan, which ultimately leads to a clan filling up with people who have gone inactive.
There is a long term issue there, but I don't know as a straight up inactive rank that excludes them from checks is the way forward.
I'll reignite some discussions on it, and see what happens. No promises obviously but I can at least get it talked about some more for you guys.
To clarify, the activity points are only penalised if over 50% of the clan is inactive.
yeah I can see that, and I won't say I disagree with the decision not to have an inactive rank for now. Aside of not being the priority, the new system is fairly easier to get past and having more than 50% inactive members is kinda lame (I wouldn't mind having these clans around though, should be their option whether to keep inactive members or not, without being somewhat
punished for that). That is the only point of the system update that still feels harsh (for some clans) but I like how things are going and I won't bother complaining until I feel like my clan is being harmed.
Last edited by Lionet; Jan 19, 2019 at 02:25 PM.