View Single Post
Originally Posted by Arctic View Post
i agree, and thats why i believe this rule can work if context is taken into account. if i recall correctly, the default procedure for handling bickering and harassment between users is for them to try to settle those issues between themselves first, before taking it to staff. if u tell me to stop but i keep being an asshole to u, then i will get infracted/banned for it. i doubt people will get banned for friendly banter.

i believe it should be discouraged in the community, especially because it is a small community, easier to manage. usually that sort of language isnt acceptable anywhere and will get u punished in larger communities. its also, imo, a bad look for the staff to close an eye to that kind of language

sure, but i think staff also used to lowkey endorse toxic behavior a few years ago by having that "grow thicker skin" attitude... and by having some real assholes in staff as well. i think its in everyones best interest to move away from that, to make the community more friendly and approachable


I agree with almost all of this! I have concerns, and I don't think these recent rule changes will have a net positive. And I don't think people will be banned for friendly banter, but I do believe that implementing nebulous rules that introduce the potential for misuse is ridiculous, especially when they're only implemented because of people who think they get to decide what is and isn't offensive - something that I find offensive and will argue against. And if I think someone is being a piece of shit, I want to be able to call them on it without fear that I'll be punished because they have thin skin.



Censorship starts small.
-----
I have a right to be an idiot, and you have a right to call me one.


Arctic: no <24hr bump for you.
Last edited by DrGonz; Jan 20, 2020 at 07:58 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump