Originally Posted by Bison

Interesting
let me suggest a few things that could give this idea some "framework" and prevent abuse.

1.Narrowing the definition of clan allies. Clan allies = Allied clans ...and nothing more.
Single clan allies would not be included so as to not complicate the mechanism. That's cruel, i know
2.Only members of allied clans could join the war on your side.
3.A clan would not be able to wage wars against allied clans.
4.Max Number of allied clans limited to 2-3, maybe even less (explained in point 5).
Having many allies sounds cool, but it's a double-edged sword.
Finding someone to fight can be difficult in that case (because of point 3), and therefore you lose a good source of activity points and increase the risk of death of your clan (if it's official).

Let's go back to point 3 for a moment, because it's a bit tricky.
Allied clans would not be able to wage wars against each other, but there would be situations in which the enemy clan would use members from your allied clan as support.
...very awkward situation, isn't it? x'D ...and it opens the door to some abuses
But there is a remedy.

5."Twin clans", lol, or something like that, idk how to call it. Basicaly your clan can only have one official ally.
The idea of simple alliances containing only two clans solves all of the above problems.
In this configuration, the third party to the conflict cannot be neutral because it cannot be both your ally and your enemy's ally.
Your enemies have their allies, you have yours and that's it, everything works.
You also don't have to worry about finding a clan to fight with.

What do you think about it? does it still match your vision or have i gone too far?

Your idea is very cool.
It would be good to know what the staff think about it.