Originally Posted by Bison

So you prefer the idea of triple alliances instead of double ones.
In that case, it would be necessary to add some mechanism to eliminate the neutrality of the 3rd party.

For example, if a 3rd clan was invited to war by both sides of the conflict and is an ally of both sides, it must choose one of them.
Members of the 3rd clan will only be able to join the clan they have decided to support.
This would, of course, last from the beginning of the war to the end.
...hahaha, that would spice up the game. I can imagine some top anime betrayals

As you can see, a whole additional mechanism is needed here
That's why Max and I thought about alliances consisting of only two clans.
Better to start with small steps. Maybe it can be improved later.
So far, we don't even know if the devs/staff are interested in this idea at all.


Maybe so, and it would be turned off during these events

...or maybe not xD
Imagine clans breaking alliances just to represent themselves separately during CL, putting friendships on the line to achieve their own success.
Of course, it doesn't have to be a form of betrayal, allied clans can just agree that it's only a temporary separation and they'll come together after the event.
Some clans would probably choose to fight together and win together putting their pride aside and choosing the power of friendship, LOL.
I just don't know what the prize distribution would look like in such a situation.