The AI should be seen as a support mechanism, not a decision-maker. In the judicial system — where decisions carry serious legal consequences — some countries have begun to explore the use of AI to assist with case management and legal research. These initiatives are not about replacing judges, but about giving them better tools to make informed and timely decisions. If AI can be cautiously and ethically introduced into such a high-stakes environment, its use in online forums, which are less formal but still require fairness and order, seems even more justifiable. That said, when we look at specific communities like the Toribash forum, the situation has important detail. The volume of activity and complexity of moderation tasks there typically don’t demand the scale of automation that AI provides. More importantly, moderation in Toribash tends to follow a model based on equity—evaluating each case individually and with a sense of fairness that goes beyond rigid rule enforcement. In such a context, the human element isn’t just important—it’s essential. While AI could assist with repetitive tasks like spam detection, the heart of moderation in Toribash lies in understanding people, not just patterns.