Originally Posted by
hydrotoxin
And I'd like to point out that I'm not opposed to pro-gay legislation, or even gays themselves. Marriage is a religious rite, and Judeo-Christian religions frown upon gays- i.e;
"If a man sleeps with a man, or a woman sleeps with a woman, as a man sleeps with a woman, they shall be put to death".
Civil unions are fine by me, but marriage is, at the most fundamental level of the largest religion in the world, unacceptable. I just don't consider the inability to naturally reproduce to be a societal boon, but as I said before, they can perform just as well as a "normal" member of society in terms of economic roles. I fully acknowledge the fact that homosexuality will be acceptable in not too many years-- I'm just pointing out that RIGHT NOW, they aren't.
I don't know how many times i have to bring this up, but marriage is
NOT just a religious ceremony, but a contract which carries far more benefits than the phony "civil union". Either we strip it of it's practical benefits and leave it a purely religious rite, or we grant access to all citizens.