Making it legal and or acceptable is much different then making it a requirement. The point of Odlov's argument is to say that people should be more accepting of nudity. Not destroy clothing and become a nude colony. That's extremely ludicrous.

To the obese: I am not obese, quite the opposite, im "a shrimp". I am very small and slender. But say an obese person decides "I don't want people to see me like this, I don't like being naked". That's okay. They can walk around and perform all their daily activities with clothes on. What I believe (and I think Odlov does as well), is the tolerance of nudity should be heightened.

Someone made a point earlier on as I was reading through this thread stating (this is paraphrased) "A game with one sex scene in it would be rated much higher then when you kill thousands of people in a video game". That's absolutely right and it's ridiculous. I can't see a nude person in a movie at the movie theaters because I am not of age but I can go there and watch one man dismantle machinery, kick in people's faces, and blow up countries? That's insanity.

"Think of the children". A quote from Odlov's first post. My point is: think of what the children are going to find out once they turn say 9 years old: Boys have a penis, Girls have a vagina, Girls have larger breasts, Girls have periods. And babies come from sex. They will find that out before they know how to find the square root of 9. So what's the big deal? It shouldn't be deemed gross.

The purpose of clothing isn't what's up for debate here. We all know it. But as Odlov said: People use clothing nowadays to show their social class, their political stances, etc. etc. If we truly wish to unify each other, why not wear the same uniform we were all born with? Our skin.