Originally Posted by Oracle

... that's the bloody point of a dissenting opinion. You seem to fail to grasp the point of a debate. Second, it's not evidence because it doesn't prove anything. Paranormal hunters are the worst perpetrators of the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy on the planet. They literally take any anomaly from a perceived normal and then claim it's proof. They never can predict what anomaly they will see, they just claim virtually anything is evidence, then marvel at how anything occurring is proof.

Two, can you prove it wasn't anything other than something paranormal? This is again a fallacy being committed. Just because you don't know why something happened is not a reason to believe it was something paranormal. This is the reason why nobody took the Ancient Aliens guy seriously. The logic was literally "I don't know, therefore aliens". Now replace aliens with ghosts/demons/molemen or whatever the fuck you want and it's still the same fallacy. You are ascribing an event to a cause without any evidence to even show a correlation, let alone causation. You're assuming something exists to explain a situation you don't understand. That's awfully convenient that you wouldn't know why it was happening unless it was aliens/ghosts/demons/goatsharks, in which case it makes PERFECT sense. Sound a little bit like wishful thinking?