Originally Posted by
protonitron
Freedom is not the problem. The problem is the future of countries and their governments being treated as an investment by companies who care about profit. If someone donates then the donation should be treated as a donation and not an investment.
But it's not treated as a donation. It's treated as a bribe. This is allowed because Justice Kennedy said so. His ruling is
clearly the problem. He defends it by saying it's legal under freedom of speech because he applies freedom of speech to corporations.
The corporations' 'freedoms' is the problem. The bribeocracy is defended as constitutional. That's the problem.