Originally Posted by
ImmortalPig
"... entirely new way to discriminate"? I don't think you have a pragmatic to bring that up besides "it makes a good line".
Your English is bad. Pragmatic isn't a noun. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Originally Posted by
ImmortalPig
The only difference between the new iphone and gm is magnitude, and even then it's quite arguable. Depending on the cost and magnitude of legalized gm there may be a huge impact or no impact.
Yes, and that's my point. We don't know the impact this will have on society and you were saying before that that you know everything and that there's
no cons to gm. We don't know the magnitude of the impact or even what impact it will have. It's totally wrong to be so certain in your position that there's no cons to gm.
Originally Posted by
ImmortalPig
Calling it a defense implies I need to defend my position. Your argument is "inequality is bad", blah blah blah, my deluded implications about your position that I don't understand
.
Originally Posted by
ImmortalPig
Social class and inequality are unsolvable problems without radical solutions like communism and widespread gm.
Nope. You don't know every solution to the problem. Class is much more intricate that just technology and politics.
Basically, you have a rigidly optimistic and teleological perspective about gm.
Last edited by Ele; Feb 3, 2015 at 02:14 PM.