Originally Posted by 2WC

I closed it the first time, idk who did it the second time.
I saw the points you've made and left it alone.

Instead of assuming I've done something, look into it more. kthanks was informed i indeed closed it twice. too bad i don't pay attention to what im closing half of the time,thought i was closing the other thread I closed x2. I still stick with my statement below tho.

ALso, I dont need to know why this Needs to be implemented.

with stackable items, you would still have to view an unstackable version of the items

It's the same with sets, put the items in a set, name the set what items are in the set, if you want to view the items in the set, you'll still get the long ass list of items.