i'll try to get my point across as simple as i can so you can understand it all, i can clarify anything you don't understand

it's not about if i LIKE your style or not, that's not the case at all. clearly we all liked your "movies" with martial arts and sound effects you did before. that's a style you did well.

this style after you stopped using sounds and started editing more is what isn't DONE well. it's not that it's a BAD style.
my original post was that the video didn't really match the song, and i think it's because you tried to make it fit with the title of the song/video rather than what it sounds like.

around 1:20 it's very dynamic, and the points where sync are very clear and you know that because the sync is there, but there isn't something that makes it really pop out like it should during those two hits in that particular replay. better chosen effects will make up for the under-editing that you're looking for. emphasis on how under-editing isn't a bad thing.

when i say your flashes aren't keyframed, i mean there is no animation to them. i use the exact same flashes in most of my videos, i think they look nice. the way i use them is fade a white solid color on a layer set to "add" and fade it in and out. you can also keyframe the "brightness" effect by clicking animate when adding it to a clip, if that's what you're using.

when i say "style", look at the different videos in my above post, each person chooses effects, keyframes their cameras, chooses songs, moods, panning/cropping, etc in their own way. i think what you've been making isn't personalized enough to be called "your" style, and looks too basic.


hopefully i made more sense this time