Originally Posted by
Ele
... Somebody's 'right to be offended' shouldn't trump somebody's right to free speech, especially when it's not even hate speech and intending no offense.
I couldn't have said it better myself, Ele. I think we should infract for obscene language. It clearly shows the community position without making a hard line-in-the-sand. Of course if a user receives to many infractions them they may still be banned. Can anyone tell me how this does not solve the issue with the most even compromise?