O lo and behold, the favoured adore-technique, so that the clan can once again know how it is to be on the recieving end of a nice-guy's love.
For I had not witnessed the first jest and as such can not know how you are "kidding again", sequentially followed by a section presented to be about yourself, yet mostly limited to your adoration of Moop.

O, for is it not immoral for a man to share knowledge of his self-proclaimed aptitude of dancing through written word, rather than practical presentation?
And is it not the act of a simpleton to in his initial communication focus more on how [not] to contact him, rather than who he is?

Is a man a villain for being vicinal to such incompetents?
Do not answer questions I have not asked and do not ponder my future reactions. Present the information with confidence, and I shall not need to ask the question.

Thankfully, your application ends with two choices, and I myself resolutely opt for the second one.
You would have to be a troll parodying the personality at display - or a master twerker - for me to reconsider.