Before you bash the scientific method you should at least put the effort into understanding what it is.

Critical rationalism according to Karl Popper solved the induction problem posed by David Hume. The induction problem is that you can never really know if something is true until you go out and check every possible instance.
eg. are there only white swans? You cannot know until you have looked at each single swan on this planet.

Karl Popper solved it with trial and error.

Question: Which colors can swans be?
Hypothesis A: Only white
Hypothesis B: Black
Hypothesis C: Black and white
Hypothesis D: etc

So you go out in the world and cross off all hypotheses that are incorrect until one remains. You may have to modify existing theses until you figure out a theory that is correct.
That works because while you cannot prove something is absolutely correct you can definitely prove that something is incorrect.
You figure out all logical possibilities and try to disprove them all. When you try to disprove something hard and it still keeps standing it must be a pretty good shot at the truth.

So spare me with religion. You have no idea what you are talking about if you say that the scientific method is based on faith.

PS: this all is like.. what? 8th grade stuff? Why are we even discussing this.