Ok sorry hes an islamophobe and still discriminatory, the effect is the same as racism except a different group of people.


I dont see the point in antagonising over my wording, the effect of his actions and words is the same and youre fully aware of it so why? Sure my wording was wrong but it didnt really have a bearing on the point I was making


Its not at all a strawman lol, lets substitute the word racist with discriminatory - please explain how thats a strawman? I used an example to show my point - I did not create a similar sounding argument to the one against me to argue against, thats what a strawman is