Originally Posted by
wibblefox
Lol it doesn't say "from problem areas" that was just part of what Trump actually said at the time. But you are right it's talking about Muslim immigration from everywhere.
No thats what he said AFTER the backlash from this
If you've got no legitimate complaints may aswell imagine some huh?
Good thing I brought some up hey!!!!!!!
Muslim immigration <> Muslim travel. Eg if I go to Mexico for a holiday, I'm not immigrating there. I thought you understood the difference but I guess not.......
I do know the difference actually, the point is, if they can still go on holiday to the country they can still commit terrorist acts there. You dont actually have to be in your country of residence in order to commit a terrorist attack
You are just saying stupid things at this point so you have something to complain about. Time for some reflection my friend.
Stupid things like "a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States" is "not all muslims" right????????
xD XD Xd XD I got caught lying kek
Lol but again stop trying to create a dichotomy. Every time you complain that Trump's policy wouldn't have stopped an attack you know you are advocating for all Muslims to be kicked out of the country right? It is not an all or nothing situation.
No, Im not at all. What a load of shit.
I like how you threw out that 1/2 straight away and counted it as 1 though, very honest of you.
Yeah cause 1 person on their own totally cant do terrorist activities thats not possible that never happens.
Its far more dishonest to ignore the fact there were 2 attackers.
I think you might find that counting the attacks by a group of 2 people as 4 attacks is a bit dishonest too, but not as dishonest as not counting the attacks by Ghlam, the attacks at Chattanooga, Thalys, Parramatta, and Instanbul airport.
Actually I counted it as 4 attacks because it was 4 attacks, makes sense right??
Also there were more than 2 people involved in the 4 attacks, there were more than that in the Charlie Hebdo attack alone.
"Omg counting attacks that arent in the West, so dishonest"
"Omg not counting attacks not in the west that fit my narrative, so dishonest"
Lol I adore the assertion that if asylum seekers aren't alowed to travel the 10,000 km journey to USA then they will die. There's around 100 countries closer to the middle east than the USA, but sure it's their fault for being big bad bullys and not wanting terrorists within their borders!!!
If every country said no to asylum seekers and enacted the proposal that you seem to support then yes there would be a whole lot of deaths as a result... If youre taking this from a point of view of not giving a shit about the rest of the world other than america point of view we shouldnt be taking any attacks out of the US into account we certainly shouldnt take into account those not from the west, how dishonest of you.
However I would hope that the worlds biggest superpower would care at least
His plan is outlined very clearly on his website, to get from his plan to "He did originally intend to ban all muslims from entering the country" requires a certain degree of imagination, thus I call it "imaginary".
Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States
Nice of you once again to 17 word quote out of an entire article. As usual, why do you need to read the entire article when your leftist buddy on twitter facebook (?) can tell you what to think.
No I did not see it on facebook either!!!
I have read the whole article, it at no point suggests than it is not about all muslims, in fact it is pretty clear about the fact it is all muslims. The 17 word quote summarizes the article well. The rest of the article is "reasoning".
I am talking about immigration, it is still an issue. Before you get stuck up on that again, we are talking about people immigrating.
Last edited by SmallBowl; Aug 12, 2016 at 05:14 PM.