This makes me want to kill myself. If I see another bullshit page long semantics argument, someone's getting infracted. It is neither useful nor helpful.

Pig, rather than fuck around for 5 posts, not explain yourself and be deliberately antagonistic (as I've warned you about being before), just be straight.

"I was asking if it was certain not to happen, not if it was likely to happen". That's all you needed to say. Pretty bloody simple, innit?

SmallBowl responded to your initial question based on the implication behind your question - i.e. what happened in Turkey could happen here. Smallbowl just did what you do all the time to everyone, he responded to the implication behind your post rather than what the post textually says. Now you're whinging 'that's not what I said, respond to what I said' - A line I'm sure you heard from dozens of people you've argued with here.

Going forward in this thread, as I've said, I don't want to see any more semantic bullshit. If there is another disagreement with what someone is/isn't saying, I expect that when a person is asked for clarification they explain themselves (they don't fuck around for half a page, talking shit).