Originally Posted by
cowmeat
This is your top 10 players, almost a direct correlation with games played and elo, so if you aren't absolutely shit you can just farm games and be #1.
Well done with your "skillbased" system. Is our top player SO MUCH better than the rest to be ahead by 20 elo, or has he just farmed more?
So in order to be #1 at the end of three months you have to have played a thousand games, and then you wonder why people don't want to tryhard with matchmaking.
Can't see the problem here tbh. The more games you play and win, the higher you get in ranking, isn't that the purpose? This isn't the first time you complain about ranks being based on how many games were played but you never suggested a better system. Ask the community who's the best and give them rank 1? Consider W/L ratio? Are you literally saying that a player who had 500 wins out of 640 games should have a lower rank than someone who played 200 games and won 180 of them?
Originally Posted by
cowmeat
Oh well, I guess I'm going to stop posting about problems since my style is too whiny.
Have fun with your matchmaking, not playing that shit anymore, since it's beyond criticism.
Well none of your comments in this thread correlate with what you posted in
MM discussion thread and they're basically whining, yeah. It's been made exactly as promised and we keep changing things according to players' requests but yet you behave like we ignored everyone "again" and it's our fault the playersbase isn't similar to Dota's so there's a chance you'd be matched against the same opponent for the sake of getting matched (will look into getting a min wait delay added for these cases but there's not much that can be done about it).
Opinions are always welcome, it's just that if you're trying to copy snake's behavior, you'd be getting replies that match it. Will also move all this to S&I thread as it's more about the system's basics than how the season is run.