Originally Posted by sir

Can't see the problem here tbh. The more games you play and win, the higher you get in ranking, isn't that the purpose? This isn't the first time you complain about ranks being based on how many games were played but you never suggested a better system. Ask the community who's the best and give them rank 1? Consider W/L ratio? Are you literally saying that a player who had 500 wins out of 640 games should have a lower rank than someone who played 200 games and won 180 of them?