Originally Posted by
DarkEmber
A stupid person smoking weed is not harming anyone else? What about people who drive high? People who expose others to the smoke, which IS harmful? People who peer pressure others into smoking weed, and then expose them to the risks?
I agree with you that there is no way to argue that it shouldn't be legalised in some shape or form: for purely medicinal/research purposes. A sizeable portion of people who want to legalise weed are those who already smoke it. Why? You smoke it, and presumably get away with it anyway, and have shown that you are willing to disregard the law (unless you live somewhere this is already legal). If you're going to smoke it anyway, what difference does a law make? Smoke it, fine, but don't push to make it legal and encourage others to take up the habit, as it inevitably would. At least the law will stop more honest people who would be otherwise compelled to smoke weed.
The first half of your argument is better at saying alcohol should be banned than saying weed should. Alcohol has been shown to be more detrimental to your reactions (and ability to drive) than weed, in addition being drunk makes you more confident and therefore, compared with weed, more likely to believe you could drive the car.
The risks associated with weed are intrisically lower than with cigarettes and alcohol. The fact they get away with smoking weed is pretty irrelevant, they dont like the fact there is any sort of risk anyway. Not that it should matter, but I dont smoke in any form.