I think I get what Ele is pointing out and I partially agree with it. Instead of thinking about how many active members a clan have it's better to think of how much activity it is producing.

Like, if in Team A there is 7 active members and Team B has 10 active members, even though the Team A is way more active with 7 active members than 10 from Team B. Then there should be this window to a few people to carry the whole clan in the back or something, because they are producing as much activity as the others.

welp that was what I understood from it, in general. Anyways I'm pretty sure there is this possibility with the current system.


Now in my point of view this new system is quite fair and shouldn't have major changes. Pushing people into playing the game should be done anyways, but I don't like the idea of being impossible to keep the clan alive without playing constantly, there are many clans that can't be that active in game but honestly 5 games to get yellow sounds fair. I can't talk for other clans but in Vector we are holding up pretty well and striving to keep alive, something that should be charged to clans.

About the small clans having full activity I still agree with sir, I can't see why a clan with 5 members having full activity would be threatening to anyone, and having a clan with 20 members in it and only 5 members or so being able to play a few games in throughout the whole month doesn't sound like an active clan. Everyone have to contribute with that as well instead of keeping in the safezone while posting shit and chatting comfortably with the bois daily and have this considered as active (this example is really shitty though, don't get me wrong there). Many clans could feel comfortable if they could secure activity to the clan just by posting stuff daily, summing up my thoughts

Sorry if I didn't get your point Ele but, if you think the question is how much activity a clan produces overcomes the idea of a clan productivity as a whole I disagree with you, even though you got me hard with your posts and arguments and I changed my mind 4 times before posting something. In that point where your arguments doesn't make sense I strongly disagree with sir because there is a lot of fundamentals in your words even though I disagree with most of them.