Well I am not innocent when it comes to unnessesary posts, when I get the infraction I think about it - and then I take it.

But I guess some might have the wrong picture of me, my opinions are mostly from a general point of view because I don't really want too dive deep in some topics since they are a waste of time (in my opinion). But still I be on point and my post is always referring to the topic of the title.(when its not wibbles).

But who do you want to blame when you feel depressed ? You say no, the Moderator says yes and thats the end of discussion.

He's trolling you know. I honestly doubt he's / she's a muslim.

You gotta realise that this ain't exactly a debate/argument forum though. We had that, it was called 'debate' and eventually at one point religious people had their debate access removed. I don't remember much from this time, but I can imagine the board would've then been left with a bunch of arrogant wankers smelling each others farts, jerking off over the scientific method.

Discussion isn't like that though. It's an opinion forum. If an opinion is shown to be faith-based and laughable, then that's punishment enough - To have your opinion shown to be nonsense and ridiculed on this public stage (i.e. Mallymkun and his sexual prudity) is enough. If you post crap, it will, through the discussion process, be revealed to be crap.

There's no need to start deleting posts by religious people in Discussion and go back to the 'Debate' ruleset. We're adult enough so as not to need some moderator to 'protect' us from faith-based reasoning like that.