Ok first off, the reason I didn't explicitly state what got you banned is because I was 100% sure you knew and just wanted to do exactly this, try to weasel your way out of it.
Had you shown any actual intention to apologize or compensate for your actions, I would have told you what you said that got you banned, but the fact is all you did following your ban was to call me slurs repeatedly and express your wish for me to commit suicide. Not a showing of any goodwill, so I didn't feel it necessary to give you the benefit of the doubt.
It has absolutely nothing to do with who you were actually talking to and who reported you, and the fact that it wasn't fire who reported you makes your situation neither better or worse.
Now the reason why you got punished for your profanity and toxicity is because everyone else who was being toxic in chat was not on ZT. This is what being on ZT means, you get Zero Tolerance.
You have proven, time and time again, that you think nothing of slurring and insulting community members in the most annoying and disruptive way possible, including staff when you feel safe (like on the win discord).
If you open that PM and read it, you will notice a handy little button saying "report".
Super Moderators (or most staff for that matter, despite what you think) can't actually read your PMs, so unless you report it, we can't do anything. Ironically since you seem to be so adamant to claim that fire wasn't actually offended on the behalf that he didn't report you, I can just as well claim that you weren't actually offended by that PM and are just trying to throw other people under the bus.
In summary, your situation and Diamonds are nothing alike. There is no actual proof yet that Diamond did anything wrong, wheres there is proof and plenty of precendent for you harassing users. The only point I would be willing to argue on is the severity of the harassment taking place and, to be honest, I am always willing to have a civil discussion on ban lenght as long as I don't get called slurs or asked if I've killed myself every day.
It's easy to claim you had no idea after the fact, but arguing about this is moot at this point anyway, since you now know what got you banned, and just as I had predicted, are trying to weasel your way out.
Not pictured in your little screenshot is the extensive history we two have arguing in ban appeals, and it's always the same pattern: You get banned, then ask for why specifically you got banned, and then try to talk yourself out of it. Never once have you actually shown any inclination that you might be learning from your constant bans that your behaviour is simply not welcome, no instead on previous appeal you tried to justify how you managed to accrue 6 harrassment bans on a single account.
And I would be careful calling attention to the "emotions" of our posts. I can tell you that the only "emotion" in my post on your ban appeal was irritation, while you seemingly got so hurt by me banning you yet again that you failed to reflect and instead had to resort to harassing me, too. I wonder who really is more emotional about this?
The difference between you calling your friends "bitch" during a duel is that your friends wont report you.
You can call your friends anything you want as long as nobody else sees it.
this
As i've told you literally hundreds of times by now, if you keep getting harassed by the same users or the same users always provoke you, stop dueling with them, start reporting them, put a password on the room or hell even stop playing for all I care.
Literally almost any other approach to this you could take would not lead to you getting banned, yet you always take their bait, and end up getting reported. It's not my fault you never learn, although it does make this a lot more tedious.
This is the only part where you might even have a point. As I've said, I am well aware of the relationship between you and Whimper, and I am willing to believe that he is purposefully setting you off most of the time.
HOWEVER, this is not the case on this most recent ban. If Fire reported you instead of Whimper, the only thing that'd changed would have been the title of the ingame report. Your toxicity and provocations would have been the same, and you would have still been banned.
Your arguement makes no sense, because there were no screenshots that were taken out of context, it was an entire chatlog that went back all the way to Whimper joining the room an entire hour before you said the things that got you banned. And before you ask, no, Whimper didn't say anything to provoke you, he was a bystander in this report and just witnessed you harassing Fire and decided to report you.
Do I think he reported you specifically because he dislikes you, and not because he was actually offended? Yeah probably. But as I've said, his intentions when reporting you don't matter, as it's about your behaviour and not his. In this report, your toxicity towards Fire came from yourself being worked up and having no filter, whimper was simply the one who reported you.
You compared your situation to diamonds in the way that you claimed to have been unfairly banned and ignored, despite that not being the case. Your ban appeal was responded to, you dropped it, then made the exact same appeal a few weeks later and it got closed immediatly. If you weren't statisfied with my answer to your original appeal, you could have voiced your opinion but you did not and so it was eventually archived.
edit:
Tell you what, if you still want to discuss this most recent ban, make a new ban appeal or tell me here that you want me to reopen your last one, and we can discuss unbanning mouth, as this is not the place for ban appeal talk. Otherwise I don't see this thread serving any purpose
I just want to take a moment to applaud Chirs' mature handling of this situation.
The point being that I support seeing staff publicly admitting mistakes and standing firm on other points. It's important that the community is able to see sensible handling and explanation of reports/bans as there is a general lack of trust in the reporting system and so on.
I don't agree with every point Chirs made, but at least I can better understand his viewpoint and the system/process of this kiindaaa thangy, and it's a stretch to claim this is a completely unfair moderation.