Closing borders to specifically muslims is a pretty racist idea yes, however you swing it

lol nice way to frame the situation, if only that was true.
The real situation is desperately grasping at straws trying to manipulate the situation to try and talk shit.
Same people who say "omg Trump just put a hit out on Hillary" also say "omg Trump wants to fuck his daughter" and "omg Trump is going to deport all Muslims and even stop American troops who are Muslim from returning home!" After 1000 such bullshit lines what am I expected to think?
The left puts out so much bullshit that any rational person has 0 trust in anything they say. So yeah when you started harping on about how Trump is calling for Hillary to be killed I jump right to ad hominem because crying wolf over and over again actually does leave an impression.
From the amount of bullshit that is being put out right now I doubt there are many rational or moderate supporters of Hillary left.
Yeah saying you want to close borders because enemies are known to be sneaking in is a very racist idea, how dare he..............
I don't understand how it's "racist", when Muslims aren't actually a race, but followers of Islam.
source
I don't understand why you think a distaste for a religion automatically means a distaste for a race.
Well no the original plan was to close borders to immigrants from problem areas until effective vetting measures can be implemented. But to the left this instantly became "BAN ALL MUSLIMS PUT THEM IN THE OVEN" or whatever happened to fit their Trump = """LITERALLY""" Hitler narrative.
Closing borders to those matching the descriptor of a group that wants to kill you is completely legitimate.
Stop using "racist" and "discriminatory" as buzzwords when in reality discrimination is not negative. Arab Muslim immigrants from Syria are inherently a more dangerous group to let in to the country than, for example an ethnic Japanese from Kyoto. Construing reality as being "racist" is counter productive and you will end up like Pouffy claiming that you should ban ALL travel of ALL kinds to avoid being perceived as "racist".
Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States
His specific suggestion was limiting immigration from high-risk countries like syria, iraq and afganistan. Please describe to me where he suggests that he hates islam?
Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States
Yeah I'm sure that is what the leftist media originally reported (lol).
If the KKK were hiding infiltrators in Christian immigrants and the USA was an active warzone, with the KKK committing atrocities and telling everyone they are hiding infiltrators in the immigrants and that they want to kill everyone in my country and any country like mine, and if we had seen evidence of this and it is known to be taking place, then yes I absolutely would vet Christian immigrants coming out of that area.
Read the rest of the statement my friend. Don't just pasta one sentence without context when it is right in front of your nose.
"DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT ON PREVENTING MUSLIM IMMIGRATION
Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on."
This is exactly what I said: "the original plan was to close borders to immigrants from problem areas until effective vetting measures can be implemented."
I see now how you are able to come to that conclusion, you read one sentence (probably one that someone tweeted at you as a tl;dr, no?) then figure "LOL I DONT HAVE TO READ SHIT I ALREADY KNOW". If you actually took the 5 seconds to read the title the narrative would be completely destroyed.
Let me read your statement again: "His original plan was to stop muslims entering and leaving altogether"
As you can see, what you said is DIRECTLY in contradiction to what the official source says.
1. No he is not going to ban Muslims from leaving, it clearly says "shutdown of Muslims entering the United States"
2. No it is not "altogether" it is "MUSLIM IMMIGRATION", ie immigrants. It's now bolded and in caps, there's no way you can miss it this time.
3. You completely missed the part where he said "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on." This is only a temporary solution so that no one is slaughtered by extremists, once a solution is found then Muslim immigration will be reopened, hopefully with an effective vetting process.
So just one more time just so I can be 100% sure that you understand what you are reading. Not all Muslims. Not all travel. Not forever.
If you are counting countries like Pakistan, Iraq, Jordan, then maybe you are right, but I think that's extremely dishonest.
We are talking about the west.
Let's talk a trip down memory lane:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Ansbach_bombing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_N..._church_attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_W...g_train_attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Magnanville_stabbing <- Finally a national (of foreign descent)!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_O...ng#Perpetrator <- Second national (although again of foreign descent)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Januar...station_attack
About all I could think of in 2016. If Trump's plan was enforced then at the least 4/6 would have been stopped. If the imaginary plan that the left has thought up was introduced, then all would be stopped - but no one is suggesting kicking all the Muslims out of the country is a good idea.
Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States
Lol it doesn't say "from problem areas" that was just part of what Trump actually said at the time. But you are right it's talking about Muslim immigration from everywhere.
If you've got no legitimate complaints may aswell imagine some huh?
Muslim immigration <> Muslim travel. Eg if I go to Mexico for a holiday, I'm not immigrating there. I thought you understood the difference but I guess not.......
You are just saying stupid things at this point so you have something to complain about. Time for some reflection my friend.
Kek
Lol but again stop trying to create a dichotomy. Every time you complain that Trump's policy wouldn't have stopped an attack you know you are advocating for all Muslims to be kicked out of the country right? It is not an all or nothing situation.
I like how you threw out that 1/2 straight away and counted it as 1 though, very honest of you.
I think you might find that counting the attacks by a group of 2 people as 4 attacks is a bit dishonest too, but not as dishonest as not counting the attacks by Ghlam, the attacks at Chattanooga, Thalys, Parramatta, and Instanbul airport.
Lol I adore the assertion that if asylum seekers aren't alowed to travel the 10,000 km journey to USA then they will die. There's around 100 countries closer to the middle east than the USA, but sure it's their fault for being big bad bullys and not wanting terrorists within their borders!!!
His plan is outlined very clearly on his website, to get from his plan to "He did originally intend to ban all muslims from entering the country" requires a certain degree of imagination, thus I call it "imaginary".
Do you have functioning eyes?
Nice of you once again to 17 word quote out of an entire article. As usual, why do you need to read the entire article when your leftist buddy on
So uh, just to be clear. You are unironically advocating a stricter policy than Trumps while simultaneously denouncing his policy as racist? *bloodymess*
Yeah, pretty stupid mate. Maybe you should go read the article.

More like "kek" because further in your post you count that attack as being native and I call you out on it.
inb4 damage control.
Yes, you are, and above you even started claiming that holiday goers should be blocked too, something outside the scope of Trumps plan.
Honestly your argument is so contradictory at this point that you are arguing opposites within the same post.
Lol damage control detected, called that.
If your argument relies 100% on speculation, then it's not a very strong argument to say the least.
It's the same group, but sure I let you count them.
I only counted attacks in the west since we were talking about the west, I specifically said "Ignoring the 100 or so that happened in the middle east of course"... There was also a lot in Africa FYI but like I said we are talking about the west.
If you want to expand the discussion to the middle east I am happy to but just so you know, there were a LOT of attacks so you are only going to weaken your argument by admitting that they exist...
Slippery slope fallacy - just because the USA temporarily blocks immigrants doesn't mean everyone else will.

And purposeful ignorance - Trump wants to TEMPORARILY block immigration so that an effective system can be set up to stop terrorists slipping through. Don't act like he wants to stop immigration altogether.
Do you have functioning eyes? I've already addressed this a number of times.
Called it
1. The article is about immigration.
2. The shut down is only until a solution can be found.
For God's sake, can't you see the absolutely huge bolded heading? Don't you realise you are copy pasting that quote with half the sentence cut off?

Buzzfeed? Who the hell is tricking you with clickbait?!
Well apart from literally the title if you can understand context.
It's like you read a statement saying "Rock originated in the 40s" and automatically assumed that they are talking about minerals, then you made a huge ranting post about how rocks are actually much older than that, all without reading the title "The History of Rock Music". Seriously, the title says "MUSLIM IMMIGRATION" in huge bold letters. How are you not seeing this?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
After spending a lot of time not talking about immigration and pretending that you can't even read the word "immigration", what is the context of this statement?