Originally Posted by
fudgiebalz
Right now, it just doesn't seem like the answer to me.
The pro-arrest program did not generally increase victim reporting to or satisfaction with police, but it made women more reluctant to seek state intervention. Women were
right to worry that calling the cops would result in their partners’ incarceration, job loss, or deportation, or even the woman’s own arrest. Research in California
revealed that the adoption of mandatory arrest policies increased arrests of men by 60 percent and arrests of women by
400 percent. The primary deterrent effect of arrest policies, it appears, was
deterring womenfrom calling for help. And this may have had deadly consequences. A
2007 study that compared domestic homicide rates among states with and without mandatory arrest laws and within states before and after such laws found that the laws corresponded to a “54 percent increase in intimate partner homicides.” The author hypothesized that arrest had deterred at-risk women from seeking help.
The domestic violence law enforcement program was costly in other ways. Armed policing comes at a steep human cost. Take, for example, Derek Chauvin, the officer who killed George Floyd. In 2008, he responded to a domestic violence call, busted down the door of a bathroom where Ira Toles was hiding, and shot Tolles twice in the stomach. Chauvin claimed the unarmed Toles reached for his police gun. Toles
told the Daily Beast that he remembered Chauvin breaking in and beating him but not being shot. But, he added, “I remember my baby mother screaming and crying.” Policing this domestic violence incident traumatized the victim, left Toles with holes in his stomach and a misdemeanor conviction, and garnered Chauvin a
medal of valor.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/slate.c...ce-history.amp
Interesting read, long story short no. Police should not be responding to domestic violence calls.
Last edited by sir; Aug 11, 2020 at 07:08 AM.
Reason: Fixed font color