Originally Posted by
SuicideDo
Burden of proof is in the "free will doesn't exist" side of the court on account of having a mathematical equation that proves we dont have free will - prove that math out: predict my next response in verbatim.
First of all, your entire post is just insane, but I'd like to touch on this. Since I'm not gonna touch on that whole clusterfuck you posted.
Burden of proof is always on the positive. That's how it works. The burden of proof is not on the person who denies god, but the one who says there is one.
Same applies for this.
"having a mathematical equation that proves we dont have free will - prove that math out: predict my next response in verbatim."
Also, what the actual fuck?
To me the question of free will is pretty hard to answer, since its quite rooted in semantics. Absolute free will?, nah I don't think so. Our enviornment and internal mechanisms such as the brain, dictate a lot of our decissions. But I'd be ready to call the will that we have (dictated by the universe or not) free, none the less. Even if it might be an "illusion"
To me the question isn't super meaningfull. But hey, thats just me.
Last edited by cowmeat; Oct 29, 2015 at 05:14 PM.