Toribash
Original Post
Obama's Presidency
Obama's presidency is a topic of great controversy.
Many people applaud his efforts in office and while they are very valiant and brave, they are completely ineffective.
I suppose now you think I’m a racist?
Well no, I judge him harshly on his actions and not by his skin color.
I believe that an African American president can unite America in a large way but only if his policies are effective and can represent his people with pride.
So far he has accomplished nothing of any real significance in office but has been awarded with the Nobel peace prize for his efforts in the Middle East.
That is all well and good but what did he achieve. Here we can see one example of Obama alienating Israel.

He demanded an end to construction in east Jerusalem to which the Israeli Prime Minister Mr. Netanyahu was outraged.
He has no right to dictate the development of a city that is in no way the soil of America.
An openly religiously diverse city which was being fairly developed.
To say where the Jews can and can't live in a state that was declared theirs by the UN is despicable.

How did this help the conflict in any way?
The relationships in the Middle East between Israel and the surrounding states have never been more strained.
Israel feels threatened already and now more so as Obama continues to ignore the nuclear development taking place in the Islamic states.

Obama has attempted to pass several bills which have been shot down by a senate that his party controls.
Most famously his health bill was recently set forward.
What it entailed was a government run health care system in which the taxes which were already raised for the rich/middle class are being raised again to provide cheap health care for the poor.
If we look at it most employers already provide health care for their employees, so there are only very very few people without health care.
This bill will also create a one trillion dollar loss over the period of 10 years, which is money that the US government does not have.
After all we are in a recession.

Rather let charities do their job and provide for those people rather than taking the hard earned money of the rich, and we are not talking about the few who inherited it or such, and just hand it over to the poor.
The rich/middle class pay their taxes like anybody else and therefore do not deserve to be burdened with the medical aid bills of those who cannot afford it.
This is also fairly hypocritical as Obama himself was born into a middle class family.

Cnn is known as a large supporter of Obama but even their own reporters are no longer behind the president anymore. They are now publishing articles and statements that reprimand his actions.Here is one example

So we can clearly see that his Peace prize is a joke.
His efforts in the Middle East have been futile and he has done nothing to contribute positively to America.
Maybe if he spent less time listening to himself speak, and started to care about his own people rather that the opinions of the Islamic world he could keep his one million promises that he made in the election. Yes we can?
Of course we can, but we just need to know how. Please stop what you are doing for one second president Obama. Nobody cares about how you bought a little puppy for your kids and nobody cares that you had the support of Germany in your campaigned. What we care about is a leader and we do not see one in him. We all know that we can but so far nothing has happened. And anybody who points it out is a racist. A Blind follower's defense for every one of his actions.
No matter what color he is I only judge his actions. And so far the world is not impressed.
Any thoughts? I will listen to you with an open mind.
I would also appreciate other sources on the subject both agreeing and disagreeing
Originally Posted by Warcry View Post
Considering Israel has been continuously encroaching on surrounding countries for decades, he's right in that regard. I don't think he should have recieved a peace prize at all, though.

East Jerusalem is the territory of Israel. For example the western wall is in East Jerusalem and nobody can deny it in within Israel's borders. They are not developing in lebanon or anything but simply expanding its cities within their own boundries. The Islamic sector of East Jerusalem did not like the Jews building houses closer to them and Obama sided with them. If nobody else hass noticed I will point it out. Israel is a Jewish state and they can develope and live wherever they want so long as it is within the state's boundries. That is beccoming increasingly more difficult as we continue to give land away to try please the public, even though it is at the expense of Israeli citizeens

Originally Posted by Gubbin1 View Post
False. There are millions of people in our country without health care.
And just having health care isn't enough. People die because their insurance providers deny them money.
ALSO the burden on tax payers is MORE when there are people without health care because of E.R.'s.
AND don't you think it's a total douche thing to say that "if somebody is poor and they get sick they should just die already."

I never said that at all gubbin. It is not the problem of those with some money to solve individual issues for the poor. Also, you misunderstood. Obama's health care bill would only make it more expensive for the rich and cheaper for the poor. It would still be the same system exept totally unfair towards those who have any wealth. It would not cause insurance companies to pay out it would just take the tax payers money to pay for the bill of the less fortunate.
Originally Posted by Thanatos12 View Post
Obama was awarded the peace prize for "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples,” particularly his work to rid the world of nuclear weapons.

For example, bridging gaps with the Muslim world, closing Guantanamo bay, setting timetables to bring troops out of Iraq, Nuclear disarmament talks etc.

So that is at least half of your whole comment wrong as you don't even know why he won the award.



More false statements and pointless insults at Obama. Do you have any evidence all he does is listen to himself speak?
What about the healthcare issue? I mean did you just forget that for the last month or so he has been trying to push through that?
On that he signed a detailed executive order to ban torture and inhumane treatment of prisoners.
He has pit a lot of policies in place to stop bribery and corruption (banning lobbyists giving gifts etc.)

Obama has not accomplished anything in the Middle East as I have clearly proved to you.
He firstly has not done anything to stop the nuclear research and construction in the Middle East so he has done nothing to do with ridding the world of nuclear weapons.
The tension remains high if not at an all time peak and there is very high risk of war.
He did a fantastic job there didn’t he?
That point is now irrelevant.

"For example, bridging gaps with the Muslim world"
He has achieved nothing in that regard either.
The Muslims and Israelis have come no closet to peace and he has only driven one of America’s closest allies away.
As my earliest example showed you. I am not sure you have read anything in this thread so far.

Once he pulls out of Iraq there will be extreme consequences.
American forces have been keeping the peace there and once they leave all hell will break loose.
There only decent law enforcement is the American troops and therefore it is nothing but a huge mistake to pull out.

I know exactly why he won the award and it is ridiculous.
Nothing that you have mentioned has actually happened.

Now onto your second pillar
"Do you have any evidence all he does is listen to himself speak?"
Yes, all he does is make speeches and useless ones at that.
Watch the news please.
If you compare his gibberish to the speech that Netanyahu made at the UN you can see that most of what he says is irrelevant and has no significance.
What action has he actually taken?
He gave talks on nuclear disarmament but America maintains its nuclear arsenal.
And the Islamic states are continuously developing their own.
Another one of your points falls flat there.

You also mentioned the Healthcare issue that has been denied by a senate that his party control.
These are people sworn to support him and even they can’t stand by him.
No matter how hard he tries to push it through it will not go though because plain and simple it is a bad idea.

Ill reiterate.

Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
Obama has attempted to pass several bills which have been shot down by a senate that his party controls.
Most famously his health bill was recently set forward.
What it entailed was a government run health care system in which the taxes which were already raised for the rich/middle class are being raised again to provide cheap health care for the poor.
If we look at it most employers already provide health care for their employees, so there are only very very few people without health care.
This bill will also create a one trillion dollar loss over the period of 10 years, which is money that the US government does not have.
After all we are in a recession.

So he can push all he wants but there is no point.
It will just be detrimental and in laments terms will not work.

To address your final point about his policies to stop corruption.
It is a mere trivial issue compared to the recession, the war on terror, the tension in the Middle East.
Everything he has done has been trivial and pointless.
And if you would like to open the corruption door, where did the One hundred and twenty million United States Dollars come from that he spent in his campaign,
that he refuses to divulge the source.

Clearly you have not even read my post and are simply talking without any substantiation.
@ Smiley
There is such a thing as public hospitals that provide free health care.
These are government funded.
That is an essential service. However, a company that pays for your procedures is a privilege and not a right.
They pay their own taxes like everybody else, why raise there’s just so we can make health insurance cheaper.
They are private initiatives and this is damaging to the corporations.
Another thing Obama has no right to do is interfere with perfectly legitimate businesses.
It is not a right to have a private service provided to you.
So what Obama is doing is taking people’s companies and using government recourses to damage their business and profits.
If he does so well enough then there will be a hell of a lot more unemployment and then there will be a lot more people who will need to rely on the rich.
I’m not worried about how they will feed and clothe themselves but they work for their money and only owe some of it to the government.
The rest is theirs and we have no right to take it.
And they continue to take more and more.
This is the second time Obama has raised their taxes and all it reminds me of is the unjust taxation while America was under British rule.
Just reversed.
The rich are now being targeted and are being victimized.
They are People like everybody else and if we continue to raise their taxes then they will just evade tax.
Not a very hard thing to do.
So we can clearly see that it is not the responsibility of the rich to provide for the poor.
So why take their hard earned money?
Let the rich be, they aren’t all these monsters bent on destroying the poor by not paying for their health care.
They just work for their money and earn what they deserve.
Well at least the vast majority do.
Let the government pay out of their own pockets if they want to but don’t infringe on the rights of your citizens to do so.

@Slapped
Firstly
In that case what progress has he made? He has spoken on and on about how he wants to disarm but nothing is happening. Where is the evidence of your points? Sources please? Also, it is not Israel who needs to be stopped. They have a fairly small arsenal while it is the nabouring states that are developing new weapons constantly. They are a threat as we have already seen. Israel has no problem with the space they have. The reset of the countries are trying to take it from them and will surely use their new found nuclear ability to achieve this goal. America holds its power by having a powerful military. Why don’t we just disarm it? Without the factor of intimidation Terrorist groups like Hammas and Al-quieda will have the upper hand, be assured they will disarm nothing.

Secondly
Obama has made no progress. As I have said many times before the tension is growing and he is alienating Israel. Therefore he has made no progress. Not even a little but instead he is reversing efforts of great leaders before him. These issues won’t be solved in any time if they continue the way they are going. I don’t expect them to happen any time soon but we need to see some action. He talks and talks and gives more peace talks but while the citizens of all the Middle Eastern countries are afraid to step out of their homes. Believe me I know. I have large contact with Israeli and Lebanese citizens alike. What concrete plans has he set into place?

Thirdly
The Taliban did not form because America invaded. That is just an ignorant guess. America invaded because of the terrorist attack BY the Taliban and other groups. They also invaded to overthrow a regime that was completely barbaric. The Iraqi security forces rely on the training and the supervision of the American forces. While America Did not have a presence in Iraq the security forces there could not tell their ass from their elbows. They lack the experience to be thrown into a lawless state and manage on their own. And despite what you think there are countless terrorist forces out there that have not been wiped out. The vast minority has only been wiped out. The troubles will not only be caused by the Taliban for the record. The citizens will also cause problems without proper guidance of the government. Look at the xenophobic attacks in South Africa. They were dissatisfied with their essential services being provided by the government and blamed it on foreigners.

Fourthly
I am not talking about his inauguration ball. I’m talking about the untraceable 120Mill with unknown origins and providers that he spent DURING his campaign. The rest he happily released where it came from.
Last edited by kwygon; Oct 11, 2009 at 04:38 PM.
No, it’s not peoples well being. Public health care is their well being. A public hospital will charge you nothing to treat you. A private hospital can charge whatever they want and if you don’t like it go somewhere else. It’s the way the world works. What Obama seeks to reform is the Medical Aid system. That is of course when you pay a company and if you need a medical procedure they pay for you to get it. That is a privilege. The poor can get the same public health care as those who don’t have medical aid. What you are talking about is communism. Where everybody is equal and what you do doesn’t count. The poor are not being victimized. The businesses are trying to make a profit and are not specifically targeting the poor. If you can’t afford it don’t buy it. If you can’t afford an education get that rather, so that you can get a decent job when you are older. I see you agree with me there. Do we tax people so that poor people can buy cars? It’s exactly the same. It is another private initiative and therefore it is not the responsibility of those who have to provide for those who don’t. Even out the money? That just bullshit. That is just communism.
Originally Posted by Ragdollmaster View Post
Hey guys, since Odlov hasn't shown up yet, I accept the privilege of firing his argument at the Sun.



Protip; taxes, as in the increased governmental taxes being imposed on the rich (OH BOO HOO THEY CAN ONLY AFFORD TO WAX THEIR FERRARIS EVERY OTHER DAY NOW INSTEAD OF DAILY) are what pay for public hospitals, just like they pay for public schools, law enforcement, and the fire department. Nobody expects private hospitals to let in poor people for free, but how can public hospitals treat people if the hospital doesn't have enough money? This is why we've got taxes.



Yes, it is a privilege. It's a privilege that people who can afford to pay for Med-Aid aren't incapable of doing so because they're, say, immigrants from war-torn countries (Former Yugoslavia, anyone?) whose education isn't recognized by the OH SO GREAT COUNTRY OF AMERIKAH, or can't get an education and therefore can't get a high-paying job because they can't afford it. All people, however, have the right to health care, and this is typically provided by taxes because FYI, Bill Gates and Oprah cannot pay for every single poor person's health care. Charities have their place, but taxes take a little bit of money from a whole lot of people and in turn are able to provide needed services.



True, none of the rich are running around stabbing the poor because they know the poor won't be able to limp into an ER, but poor people are more less being thrown out into the cold by rich companies just looking to make a profit. "Oh, your little four year old cancer-induced son needs a kidney transplant? I see, and would you be able to come up with $90,000? No? Sorry, why don't you try the soup kitchen down the street?"



1) People being able to stay alive is a universal right, and while it has its place as a business, if you believe people should die because they can't afford to pay for health care then you, good sir, should go drown in a pile of capitalist shit.
2) People who can't afford an education can't get a good job and therefore can get neither insurance from a good job or can pay for private insurance because they're barely able to make ends meet.
3) I barely repressed the urge to track you down via IP address and smack you in the face with a large hammer for comparing private transportation to the value of a human life. Paying health taxes is not the same as pampering everyone who can't afford to pamper themselves.
4) It isn't the responsibility for the rich to pay for the poor. It is the responsibility for a human to help another human stay alive.
5) This isn't communism or socialism where people are getting everything equally. This is forking over what basically equates to fucking pocket change so that someone less privileged than you can stay alive. Where do you see in America rich people being hauled off to exile and their assets being repossessed so that poor people can split up the money? Because that's what happened in Eastern Europe during WWII. If you made a lot of money and lived near Russia, chances are you would get hauled off to Siberia for being a capitalist- which constitutes you being an enemy of the GREAT NATION.



tl;dr: You're an ignorant moron who needs to suck it up and stop believing everything being spewed out by rich people who are mad they can't afford six Yachts anymore due to taxes and these idiots who don't support Obama because they think the fact that Obama hasn't turned the entire world into a sparkling utopia yet means he's a shitty president and is proof that he's a lying commie trying to take away the HARD EARNED MONEY of the rich.

tl;dr;tl;dr: Learn not to believe propaganda and get over yourself. Kthxbye.

lol obama-fanboy overdrive much? I don't think trying to insult the OP makes your argument stronger =)

He's a long shot better than George W., but he's certainly not some kind of new age Jesus, as we're led to believe. Granted, he's trying very hard, but the sad truth is that America is never going to become this perfect land of equality. There's only so much a president can change, and in the end it's down to the American people, who are not gonna change.
Originally Posted by SmileyJones View Post
1.Medical procedures should not be a "privilege", because at some point or another everybody needs them. 2.There are middle-class families out there losing their homes because insurance premiums are out of control. You regulate the insurance companies, you give them competition, and you'll be easing the economic burden on a large part of the population. Do you want a way to fix the economy? People need money to spend! 3.Reforming the corruption of these private insurance companies is a long overdue way to improve the standard of living for the middle class. I'm sure even the wealthy would save money on their premiums, at the expense of a s4.light tax increase. You're looking out for the best interests of the wealthy, 5.while the country as a whole suffers.

6.And when the lower and middle class have no money, the rich have no way to make money. Everybody loses. We all need each other.

EDIT: 7.Also, you keep bringing up free hospitals. Could you point me to one in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, that provides free care to everyone and not just people under a certain household income? Because even if what you're talking about does exist it might be useless for middle class households. I've been looking and I can't find any.

1.The procedures are not a privilege. You can easily receive a free necessary treatment and procedure at a public hospital.
2. Then don’t buy insurance from those companies. Nobody forced them to. There are many companies that are completely reasonable with prices.
3.It is changing nothing for the middle class. It is only for the extremely poor.
4. It is a major increase. The second one. And their premiums will be no less. The government will provide free health insurance for the poor.
5.The poor may be suffering. But the country as a whole is not. The middle class people are just that. If you can’t afford to keep your house you are fairly poor I would say. That is why they call them the middle class. And they in no way will benefit from this
6.Nobody suffers. The country is doing fine. The recession was not caused by health care. It was caused by the stupidity of the money lenders around the world who went bankrupt and led to people losing the money that they invested.
7. it’s called a public hospital. A government hospital. They run based on government funds and if you can’t afford to pay, you don’t pay.
Originally Posted by steve View Post
God, everyone is blaming all the shit that is happening now on Obama.
Does anyone have the hindsight to look back and see HOW this all happened?
Obama can't manipulate time, he said so himself, he won't be able to fix things in one year, possibly even one term.
And universal healthcare refom =/= communism?
If McCain was president we would be so fucked right now.
Republicans need to stop throwing sissy tantrums and actually wise up and stop being retards. Obama's gonna be in office until 2012, they need to get that through their heads and stop voting against every policy Obama puts out. We will never get anything done this way.
Most of this is just genuine nitpicking.
WE HAVE ENOUGH PROBLEMS IN THE US AS IT IS.
WE NEED TO FOCUS ON THAT.
EVERYTHING ELSE CAN BE PUT ON HOLD.
More later.

Nobody is blaming him for the problems that were already in place before he took office. They vote against his policies because they are not what is best for the country. it’s not only the republicans. The Democrats control the senate and they are the ones voting against him. You do have enough problems. Why don’t you focus on that rather than creating more, for example a 10 trillion dollar loss?
Originally Posted by Ragdollmaster View Post
Hey guys, since Odlov hasn't shown up yet, I accept the privilege of firing his argument at the Sun.



Protip; taxes, as in the increased governmental taxes being imposed on the rich (OH BOO HOO THEY CAN ONLY AFFORD TO WAX THEIR FERRARIS EVERY OTHER DAY NOW INSTEAD OF DAILY) are what pay for public hospitals, just like they pay for public schools, law enforcement, and the fire department. Nobody expects private hospitals to let in poor people for free, but how can public hospitals treat people if the hospital doesn't have enough money? This is why we've got taxes.



Yes, it is a privilege. It's a privilege that people who can afford to pay for Med-Aid aren't incapable of doing so because they're, say, immigrants from war-torn countries (Former Yugoslavia, anyone?) whose education isn't recognized by the OH SO GREAT COUNTRY OF AMERIKAH, or can't get an education and therefore can't get a high-paying job because they can't afford it. All people, however, have the right to health care, and this is typically provided by taxes because FYI, Bill Gates and Oprah cannot pay for every single poor person's health care. Charities have their place, but taxes take a little bit of money from a whole lot of people and in turn are able to provide needed services.



True, none of the rich are running around stabbing the poor because they know the poor won't be able to limp into an ER, but poor people are more less being thrown out into the cold by rich companies just looking to make a profit. "Oh, your little four year old cancer-induced son needs a kidney transplant? I see, and would you be able to come up with $90,000? No? Sorry, why don't you try the soup kitchen down the street?"



1) People being able to stay alive is a universal right, and while it has its place as a business, if you believe people should die because they can't afford to pay for health care then you, good sir, should go drown in a pile of capitalist shit.
2) People who can't afford an education can't get a good job and therefore can get neither insurance from a good job or can pay for private insurance because they're barely able to make ends meet.
3) I barely repressed the urge to track you down via IP address and smack you in the face with a large hammer for comparing private transportation to the value of a human life. Paying health taxes is not the same as pampering everyone who can't afford to pamper themselves.
4) It isn't the responsibility for the rich to pay for the poor. It is the responsibility for a human to help another human stay alive.
5) This isn't communism or socialism where people are getting everything equally. This is forking over what basically equates to fucking pocket change so that someone less privileged than you can stay alive. Where do you see in America rich people being hauled off to exile and their assets being repossessed so that poor people can split up the money? Because that's what happened in Eastern Europe during WWII. If you made a lot of money and lived near Russia, chances are you would get hauled off to Siberia for being a capitalist- which constitutes you being an enemy of the GREAT NATION.



tl;dr: You're an ignorant moron who needs to suck it up and stop believing everything being spewed out by rich people who are mad they can't afford six Yachts anymore due to taxes and these idiots who don't support Obama because they think the fact that Obama hasn't turned the entire world into a sparkling utopia yet means he's a shitty president and is proof that he's a lying commie trying to take away the HARD EARNED MONEY of the rich.

tl;dr;tl;dr: Learn not to believe propaganda and get over yourself. Kthxbye.

The only reason you are getting this aggravated is because you are talking entirely on emotions and not for one second on logic. Please track my ip down and we will let the police decide then. So don’t make threats. Think about what you say you irrelevant little prick.
Let me now deal with your points.
1)People can stay alive without medical aid. They always do. The hospitals treat them. Have you ever seen a hospital find a dying man on the street and check if he insured first? No, what they do is save their life. Look up the Hippocratic oath.
2)So these people need health insurance. Perfect. Let’s not let the hospitals care for them for FREE and we will completely disregard the fact that they are starving like you said. Very logical.
3)Your third point makes no sense. They aren’t paying health taxes whatever that is. What they are doing is becoming reliant on the government for health insurance. We are not pampering or doing them any good. It enables them to do whatever they want medically and charge it to medical aid, of which they will now pay now premiums. I preferred the old system. If you needed health care you went to a public hospital and got is. If you couldn’t afford it, you still got it. Now... al that’s happening is that the tax payers have to pay for it.
4)Very good, let’s all eat marshmallows. It’s their choice whether they want to be good people or not. I work every Sunday raising money for charities. I actually do no matter what you think. It’s my choice. I don’t have to. I don’t have to pay more taxes to give them food. But I want to, and I do. Why be forced by the government.
5)Tax is not pocket change. You should see the difference in your gross and net salary. Its astronomical.
For the record, insulting me doesn’t make you right.
Originally Posted by Gubbin1 View Post
@Bold: "poor people got into some mess they should get themselves out"

Also, I didn't misunderstand. So the concept is that rich people pay a larger percent than poor people? You mean like the graduated tax brackets we have had since the founding of our country? You mean to tell me that people without the means to pay will have to pay less?
THIS MUST BE STOPPED

1)I didn’t say that. I said it is not the job of those who have money to get them out of their mess. That’s why we have charities and government efforts but by what standard is it acceptable to say that you need to pay for the poor. And if you don’t you get hauled off to jail. it’s a crime not to pay tax.
2)Rich people will have to pay a larger tax percentage than the rest of the country. Bye bye equality. People without the means to pay will not pay, just like they never did pay. The people with the means to pay will have to pay more to compensate. You are right, it should be stopped.
Originally Posted by SLAPPED View Post
You know I could argue with but what would be the point when you obviously have no intention of even considering that someone else might be correct?

I have a completely open mind. Discuss it civilly and with facts to support your arguments and I will consider them. If I truly feel I’m wrong I have no shame in admitting it. I hope I’m wrong. I don’t like the Idea of America being damaged by shameful policies any more than you. So by all means prove me wrong.
Originally Posted by Pirate View Post
First of all, just because he hasn't done 'anything' with nuclear weapons in the middle east doesn't mean he hasn't done anything with nuclear weapons.
1.For example, recently Obama was pursuing a treaty with Russia to reduce the amount of nuclear warheads down to 1,000 on both sides. Tell me how that is doing 'nothing.' The outcome of the proposal is irrelevant, it's not his fault if the other signer refuses to sign, and the fact that he proposed it in the first place means he is '2.doing' something about it.

Secondly, the acting general of US forces in Afghanistan/Iraq/whatever has done a lot to make their people not hate us. Bombing the living shit out of everything including citizens doesn't wor3.k. Point in case: Majority of the last 5 or 6 years. 4.You can't even fight guerrilla warfare effectively, having the citizens in the country die by the thousands (innocently) just gives more numbers to the insurgents.

You really don't know what you're talking about.

1. Contradictory to a previous post that said Obama would totally disarm
2.Wouldnt it be better to do something that worked?
3.You obviously know nothing about the war. The bombs are strategically placed to destroy military targets and minimalise civilian casualties.
4.You truly think that’s guerrilla warfare? Oh please. They are fighting in cities. Not the jungle for fuck sake.
I assure you, I have done my research.
Originally Posted by Blam View Post
1.If not many people need it, why would it cost a trillion dollar loss over 10 years?

If just the losses are a trillion dollars (so it would be costing more but money coming out of taxes lessens the load), 2.think of how much the people who would get the healthcare are having to pay.

3.How can they afford it?

Unless there's something I'm simply not getting here. (I'm just going on what you've said - I'm from England :P)

1.Because the people who couldn’t afford were being treated in public hospitals for free. Now the government is paying for it.
2.They are getting it. It’s not the standard of private healthcare but I assure you nobody is just going to be left for dead by any doctor who took his pledge seriously.
3. They don’t have to now nor did they ever have to pay.
Originally Posted by Dalir View Post
Uh, that link about how Obama alienated Israel?

1.It has 1000 ads for "Sarah Palin's NEW BOOK!" and anti-Obama propaganda ads. You expect anyone to take you seriously?

Their way of writing in the article is to make him seem like a weak jackass (using expressions like "he picked a fight" and that he is merely a "messenger".)

How much do you expect a new president to be able to do by himself? Greedy republicans like you are the exact reason he won't be able to improve your country one bit. I'd expect these kind of posts from a troll, but seeing as you're serious, arguing with you is pointless.

EDIT: Hey cool, did you play that "Defeat Obama and his Allies" game on Power Line yet?
EDIT2: Sorry oracle for the accidental edit on your post, didn't change anything.

1. All it shows is that the people who wrote the article are supporters of the republican party. The facts are still true and therefore it is relevant. So what if it is poorly written? It is still based on facts.

Please don’t make this personal dalir. I’m not looking to make any enemies but you are just looking for a fight with me. I am not getting into that.
Anybody who wants to discuss this civilly I’m open to hear you, but if you are looking to flame somebody then I have better things to do.
Oh man, I know this has been done multiple times, but man did you ask for it with that post.


Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
Obama's presidency is a topic of great controversy.
Many people applaud his efforts in office and while they are very valiant and brave, they are completely ineffective.

If they are ineffective then why make a big thread trying to debase them?

Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
I suppose now you think I’m a racist?
Well no, I judge him harshly on his actions and not by his skin color.

I hadn't thought of it until you got defensive and assumed that anyone who disagreed with you would be too ignorant to see
or comprehend these amazing points you are making but instead would resort to calling you a racist.


Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
Here we can see one example of Obama alienating Israel.

Warcry covered this in he post. Israel was invented, it is a state created by outside governments, created in a part of the world that has been in turmoil for centuries. You could fart in the wrong company is Israel and
start a war.



Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
He demanded an end to construction in east Jerusalem to which the Israeli Prime Minister Mr. Netanyahu was outraged.
He has no right to dictate the development of a city that is in no way the soil of America.
An openly religiously diverse city which was being fairly developed.
To say where the Jews can and can't live in a state that was declared theirs by the UN is despicable.


For the UN to give them the state in the first place could also be seen as despicable. As for dictating the development of a city, at least he wasn't turning it to rubble like some other presidents. Also, did you bother to check why he was doing this?


Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
How did this help the conflict in any way?
The relationships in the Middle East between Israel and the surrounding states have never been more strained.

And you have never been older than you are right this second. Also, yes they have been more strained. Saying this is the worst Israel has ever seen is a very short sided thing to say, more probably people say it only to make the situation seem more urgent, and to arouse fear and helplessness in people.



Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
Israel feels threatened already and now more so as Obama continues to ignore the nuclear development taking place in the Islamic states.

What states are these? Iran is dabbling in nuclear power, but it has never been proven in any way that it is for weapons. Our country has been down the road of chasing possible WMD's, why would we do it again?


Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
If we look at it most employers already provide health care for their employees, so there are only very very few people without health care.
This bill will also create a one trillion dollar loss over the period of 10 years, which is money that the US government does not have.
After all we are in a recession.

Everyone I know works, only about 2 of them have insurance, and that probably is worthless aside from peace of mind. "Very very few" is not a good way to describe 47 billion people. Also how will this create a one trillion dollar loss? Why make a point without also adding some sort of proof? The only reason I even ask that is because that is a very big amount of money, so to claim that we will just lose it is a very bold statement. Also, the recession is slowly healing, thanks at least a little bit to the presidents stimulus package, you know the thing that was signed shorty after the time his non-eventful career as president begain.

Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
Rather let charities do their job and provide for those people rather than taking the hard earned money of the rich, and we are not talking about the few who inherited it or such, and just hand it over to the poor.
The rich/middle class pay their taxes like anybody else and therefore do not deserve to be burdened with the medical aid bills of those who cannot afford it.
This is also fairly hypocritical as Obama himself was born into a middle class family.

Yes you are talking about the ones who inherited it and such. Also the taxes would be spread thin enough to not cause a significant burden on anyone. And not everyone who doesn't have health care is poor, and they also pay their taxes, the main difference between the poor and rich is that if you tax the poor what you tax the rich the poor people would have even less money to buy food and clothes. Our income tax already works on a sliding scale, the more a person makes, the larger amount is that is taken out. The reason people want this change to happen is that our current system is corrupt.


Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
Cnn is known as a large supporter of Obama but even their own reporters are no longer behind the president anymore. They are now publishing articles and statements that reprimand his actions.Here is one example

Good! Im glad CNN aren't puppets like Fox News. Just because a news channel (first a foremost a business, bear in mind, that may have only been supporting the president in hope of getting ratings) The fact that they are willing to say "this and this are wrong" only proves them to be honest journalists with no political agenda. Believe it or not there was a time when news was like this, before channels and papers and reporters decided to go right or left, they walked the middle ground reporting on what they saw, not who they felt was right.



Originally Posted by kwygon View Post
So we can clearly see that his Peace prize is a joke.
His efforts in the Middle East have been futile and he has done nothing to contribute positively to America.
Maybe if he spent less time listening to himself speak, and started to care about his own people rather that the opinions of the Islamic world he could keep his one million promises that he made in the election. Yes we can?
Of course we can, but we just need to know how. Please stop what you are doing for one second president Obama. Nobody cares about how you bought a little puppy for your kids and nobody cares that you had the support of Germany in your campaigned. What we care about is a leader and we do not see one in him. We all know that we can but so far nothing has happened. And anybody who points it out is a racist. A Blind follower's defense for every one of his actions.
No matter what color he is I only judge his actions. And so far the world is not impressed.
Any thoughts? I will listen to you with an open mind.
I would also appreciate other sources on the subject both agreeing and disagreeing

There's that race issue again, its in the first and last sentences of your post? Why?

And yes, people do care that he got a puppy. People need positive news or else they would go nuts. Furthermore I highly doubt the President asked any publication to talk about it, every presidents dog makes the news, but its not the presidents doing.

Things have happened actually, our economy is on a slow but steady rise. The war in Iraq has been downsized and more attention has been given to Afghanistan (the place Bush should have been all along)

Please stop watching fox news or listening to your parents before you make a thread about politics. Everything you are saying comes straight out a book written by people who are so concerned with BEING right that they dont care anymore about DOING what is right.
Organisation of Awesome: Member.