Toribash
Originally Posted by xlr84life View Post
If the punishments are the problem, are you saying it is ok to steal other people's property, allow your wife to sleep with another man, and going drunk where you could possibly go violent and where women pass out and get raped while unconscious?

The emphasis was on the severity of the punishments, and you know it.
Originally Posted by protonitron View Post
Ele, I am skeptical about the relevance of your assumption that intent is less important than effect to this matter.

Effect is always more important that intent, in any matter. If someone says they'll do something, but then ends up doing something entirely different, then it doesn't matter what they said, does it? What matters is the actual effect it's had. That's why quoting the Quran and saying it proves women have equal rights is ridiculous.

Originally Posted by protonitron View Post
Islam as a collection of scripture seems to be acceptable to you (not saying it is or it isn't, this point is entirely focussed on your ideas about intent and effect which should be the same regardless of whether Islam is good or not)

Yeah no, it's not acceptable to me. Don't know where you got that from. I was saying 'even if Islam is all sunshine and roses, that doesn't matter when you look at the result'.

Originally Posted by protonitron View Post
it seems like Sharia is partially dependant on a lot of factors which are not Islamic (one of the many secondary sources for Sharia listed was 'logic' for example).

If you're argument is 'how religious is Sharia, really?' then you've screwed yourself by posting that link in your next post. In its conclusion, it says "Finally, although Islamic law remains religious, as it has evolved in the modern era it has some characteristics that are not dissimilar to western codes."

Then there's the fact that the OIC countries all signed up to rule under the Cairo Declaration which enshrines Sharia. 'How religious is Sharia, really' doesn't matter when the OIC countries agree that all the rights in the Cairo Declaration are to be filtered through Sharia-lens. These Islamic countries are complicit in supporting Sharia, whether or not it's a primarily religious body of law (which, as your link suggested, it remains).
Originally Posted by ynvaser View Post
The emphasis was on the severity of the punishments, and you know it.

If punishment deters people from such bad acts, this world would be a better place.
And you know how much pain the said acts cause, maybe you don't, but they are people out there who have their cars stolen, computers, jewelries, money. I've seen heapes
of cctv of gunpoint robberies in US itself. Imagine how the victims feel,

Also try to imagine when the one true love of the life of a man or women, whom they trust so dearly, sleeps with another man. Can you imagine that? I've heard of stories where they became so broken that they turn to murder their wife and her lover and even suicide.

About drinking, do I have mention how much problems it causes?

Where is justice for the victims if you're going to let thieves and others off easily?
Islam maintains peace and safety for everyone in the community.
Parkour like you've never seen before:
http://forum.toribash.com/showthread.php?t=423045
Originally Posted by xlr84life View Post
Also try to imagine when the one true love of the life of a man or women, whom they trust so dearly, sleeps with another man. Can you imagine that? I've heard of stories where they became so broken that they turn to murder their wife and her lover and even suicide.

You're right. It would be far better if the woman was whipped 100 times or just killed for dishonoring her family. Honor killing is truly is far more just and humane.

We've developed better ways for dealing with shit. Sharia is antiquated and barbaric.
Last edited by Ele; Jan 14, 2015 at 05:09 AM.
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
Oh no, need permission! If having to ask permission isn't mild, I don't know what is - maybe having to leave a note?

Frame it however you like. The fact is women under Sharia have no volition to leave the house or seek unemployment. You can be as childish and petulant as you want, but 'lack of free will' is not mild.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
For the record, I don't consider having to ask permission to get a job as "violent".

If you'd bothered keeping up with the thread, you'd see that we're not so restricted by its title anymore, and that that's OK.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
That most certainly is NOT the majority.

I said 'Sharia is in many countries with low numbers of wahhabists'. Which it is. 'Many' =/= 'Majority'.

And even if it did, it doesn't matter. Sharia still affects millions of women, regardless of whether Sharia is in the majority of countries.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
You really can lead a horse to water, but sometimes it takes a lot of encouragement to drink!

You're so fucking painful.
Last edited by Ele; Jan 14, 2015 at 09:43 AM.
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
"lack of free will" - I see you are taking the liberty of framing it however you like huh. I didn't realize that under Sharia women are transformed into mindless husks!

Lack of volition = lack of free will. Women lack the free will to go outside. Women lack the free will to seek employment. Women aren't free to follow their wills.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
I realize, and that was what I was responding to...

You obviously didn't realise, or else you wouldn't have responded with 'well how is that violent?'.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
Ok, I see you have abandoned your argument completely.

Nope - I stand by it fully. You've done nothing to fault it. Sharia is in many Islamic countries. It's in many more countries in a less influential way, also.

That said, my other point also stands though. "And even if it did, it doesn't matter. Sharia still affects millions of women, regardless of whether Sharia is in the majority of countries."
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
Ok but so do men because men have to open the door first so...

There's a big difference between a door stopping you from going outside and your country's body of law (+ declaration of rights) stopping you from going outside. The way you keep trivialising this is astounding...


Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
So your definition of "many" is "a handful, a minority"? Ok.

The entire Mesopotamian region and the vast majority of the Arabic Penninsula has full Sharia law (remember when you stupidly said it was only in wahhabist countries?). That's many countries. And also, again, whether or not full Sharia is limited to those regions, that's still millions of women that are affected by it.
Last edited by Ele; Jan 14, 2015 at 12:13 PM.
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
If there was thousands of years of tradition to support it and it was the norm for millions of people and it was accepted and it worked, then it wouldn't seem so stupid.




Muslims aren't dumb animals that need you to get offended on their behalf you know...

So, are women dumb animals that need to be told what to do in your opinion?

You don't have to join a discussion just to contradict everybody with retarded statements.
Originally Posted by ImmortalPig View Post
If there was thousands of years of tradition to support it and it was the norm for millions of people and it was accepted and it worked, then it wouldn't seem so stupid.




Muslims aren't dumb animals that need you to get offended on their behalf you know...

An appeal to tradition is a fallacy. If you try to make a point please do not try to say that something's good just because it's always been that way.
I am sure you could think of many things that have been supported by many people for a long time that are actually very stupid. At least I hope you can.

Forcing women permission to go outside is a strong tool of oppression that puts them on a level similar to a child in Western society.
Seeing as you agree with it, please provide arguments why it should be considered just to treat women like they are not capable of making decisions, such as going outside, for themselves.
Do you think it is just when a woman gets punished (I do not know what kind of punishment they will receive as there have been no sources regarding this practice in this thread, but since no one challenged it I assume it's a fact for the sake of this argument) for going outside without permission?

Do you not think that having men in charge of women's daily decisions puts all women essentially on a social status beneath men?
The fact that it is a tradition does not justify anything. You will have to find arguments that would make people agree that it is a good idea to treat women like that, else things will never be changed.

The question is not if Muslims are animals. Please do not make implications like that. It is perfectly possible to criticize a society without calling people in it animals. It is perfectly legitimate to reject traditions as inhumane.
Okay, I see you are starting to pick every line apart rather than writing a coherent text again so I won't respond. I know what I wrote and I don't need you to repeat it. It's a waste of my time and it ruins the format in a terrible way. With a quick glance through what you wrote I could already see that by picking the lines apart individually rather than responding to the whole text you actually took some things out of context or pretended like there was none, thus creating easier targets. It's a very dishonest strategy.
Please learn to write coherent texts if you want to be taken seriously, just a heads up.