It does. It's simple and understandable. If we all don't mind having someone as part of the clan, why say so? Regardless, members should take time and agree with everyone, or dislike the applicant. It helps us know who to look out for. We have standards and we all know if an applicant has met them. No problems in my opinion or enough reason to change. The way we currently do this works. We want active, mature, friendly members, etc. It's nice we reach a common consensus. We should be able to see eachother a views and be ok with them.
I think you are thinking too hard zelda. We aren't a democracy. We are a group of people that try understanding everyone. I think the big part about accepting a member into the clan is how well he/she does while they are here. Not like we can't do things if they are bad. What I am trying to say is, all members have a say and if everyone wants to repeat things and don't have anything against the one who is applying, it's all good.
No need to change something no one has problems with. Zelda, if you have a problem with this system that is effecting your capability of functioning with us, please let me know. I think everything is golden. Are we recruiting to hastily? I don't see the problem with what you are describing at all.
No need to change something no one has problems with. Zelda, if you have a problem with this system that is effecting your capability of functioning with us, please let me know. I think everything is golden. Are we recruiting to hastily? I don't see the problem with what you are describing at all.
All members can give their opinion about applicants, including the ones who are even trials. We are a family, everyone is important here. Let's not ruin the fun environment. The more votes we have, the more coherent will be the decision we make.
Zelda, I understand your opinion, don't refrain yourself from letting us know what do you think <3
By the way, I think Locus should be added as a council member in my place. He deserves it.
Regarding the applicants, if no one have a reason to reject them, which I think you won't have, we will add them soon. Trial for all sounds good.
Zelda, I understand your opinion, don't refrain yourself from letting us know what do you think <3
By the way, I think Locus should be added as a council member in my place. He deserves it.
Regarding the applicants, if no one have a reason to reject them, which I think you won't have, we will add them soon. Trial for all sounds good.
Yep, trials all around sounds good to me too. I think Locus is a council member already (think I replaced Ego with him).
I agree that barring non-council members from expressing their opinions would only hinder the decision making process and upset a few members.
Also, let's review Static. Accept, deny, stay a trial for longer? Speak now or forever hold your tongue.
I agree that barring non-council members from expressing their opinions would only hinder the decision making process and upset a few members.
Also, let's review Static. Accept, deny, stay a trial for longer? Speak now or forever hold your tongue.
Last edited by Ele; Jun 11, 2015 at 02:09 AM.
I was going to say it right now. Well, I think Static did well on his trial period and deserves the 'full member' status.
Also, I will update the first post to include Locus as council member. By the way, our current trials are Noel, EJXIII, Chab and Budsi (already invited). Static being voted to become a full member.
Also, I will update the first post to include Locus as council member. By the way, our current trials are Noel, EJXIII, Chab and Budsi (already invited). Static being voted to become a full member.
