Just make it expensive of as hell. After all it's not like that fetus is going to be going to school in 5 years.
If you get knocked up it's your fault be on the pill and or wear a damn condom, if you're drunk banging people it's still entirely your fault. Abortions ain't cheap and cost the tax payers money to pay for your mistakes. Have the damn baby and put it up for adoption. Unless you're very young and have not finished school or are even in your 20s then abortion could be viable, but still. Getting rid of would be children is fucking retarded Morals a side it's still retarded. Really shows what kind of human being you really are.
It costs less to get rid of would be humans than it is for Dental that's hella fucked.
Okay, well, foetus and embryo are both words used to dehumanize. Of course, you may argue that their initial purpose is to describe the various developmental stages of the human, but it's occurred to me that the pro-choice side will use these words commonly, up until birth. In order to make the human life sounds anything but a human life, these words continue to navigate the abortion discussion, and understandably, if the pro-choice side wants to maintain that particular boundary between policy and morality.
The objective standpoint in this debate is that life begins at conception. Every scientific textbook will tell you this. You will only find arbitrary definitions as to when human life begins on the other side; some say life begins at 10 weeks, some say 24, some say not until birth, some say when he/she/it can feel pain, some say when self-awareness kicks in, etc. These aren't substantial and are lacking in objectivity. Of course, people won't hesitate to justify violence when it suits them.
If you claim otherwise, then you are openly admitting that human life has no value, that we should throw away anything we know about human development, that you are embracing a society where we live without moral consequence and do whatever the fuck we like as long as we bloody well like it. That, to me, does not sound like an improvement.
Of course, we all know what regime exterminated human beings based on their genetics.
I'm sorry, but if you're going to convince me that human life starts elsewhere, then you're gonna have to pull your sources together because that is an extraordinary claim.
If the argument was subjective, then it would be influenced by personal feelings and opinions, but this is not the case. There is a rational position to take on all of this, which goes as far as saying that when the sperm fertilises the egg, human life starts. It's the only sustainable view.
No, potential has nothing to do with it. The 'foetus' in the womb is a physically, objectively existing thing. It is vital that we don't set values on each other, no matter what our developmental stage, shape or size. Of course, we all know what regime exterminated human beings based on their genetics.