Toribash
View Poll Results:
0 Votes / 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll
View Poll Results

It just so happens, that we as a clan decided to hold off on making Parakeet live until we had actually went and raised our membercap.

We raised it, we have spots now. We started Parakeet. It has in no way shape or form changed from the original post almost a month ago til now one what it was going to be or what it is now. Rai and duck both approved it. They approved an even more outrageous version.
Last edited by Ping; Nov 18, 2017 at 09:54 AM.

Originally Posted by Ele View Post
Your whole bullshit argument there sir is based on the unfounded assumption that we created Parakeet just to avoid a membercap.

...

So kindly piss off with your bullshit argument based on membercap limits, sir.

Please Ele, I know you can read; my post wasn't just about the membercap.

Originally Posted by Ele
That was not the case. We wanted to develop players who wouldn't normally get into Parrot into players who could. Not a lot of people who apply for Parrot end up getting in. Parakeet would develop members into better members. That was the point of it.

That's exactly what I said in the beginning of my post, yes. You want to be able to recruit new people but don't want them to have Parrot tag because making sure they're worth it takes time you don't want to spend. But isn't that something that you have to do when your clan is massively known? What makes you unable to recruit them to Parrot now, put them in some "Recruits" rank with no management perms and give them guidance until they can become full members?

Saying it again, to me it looks like you found a loophole in a system, tried to abuse it but started whining when it got closed. There may be more reasons why you think a child clan is necessary but so far I haven't seen any of you mention it.
From my understanding Parakeet was made so we'd get to know more people who would otherwise be unknown. I have never been a famous person, staff, and didn't really know people in Parrot for the most part, but here I am, in Parrot for like 3-4 years and I feel like I fit in and made a lot of friends. Truth is, that age where we would accept random people who seemed cool and had a good app are somewhat over. We've built up a reputation and consider our member spots a lot highly that we'd rather not risk adding some random person we don't know who made a good app. While just adding well known people is good and all, it doesn't add a WHOLE LOT of interesting discussions and such.

So, we decided to have an unofficial clan for people to assimilate into Parrot. Its not strictly a feeder clan, more of an extension to the Parrot community. While this may seem pointless to some, its simply the most convenient one for us. We are a clan that heavily uses irc still and only a portion of us use Discord. Instead of having interested people hang out in irc to meet some of us and use Discord to meet some more, and post in our forums to meet with the rest, why not just just give them an existing community? The reasoning is simple: People don't like to wait. A person who isn't well known but would otherwise be an enjoyable addition would probably not get in for a few weeks, and eventually give up and join another clan. Another recruit lost because we're strict in our applicants.

Instead of that, extend them an invite to Parakeet. They may find that they enjoy the players there enough to stay, and maybe if they're more close to the Parrot clan we can send them an invite. I really don't see a moral issue with this. we aren't doing this for a higher membercap, we aren't going to farm wars on them (you can spy on our war history if you don't believe me), and the argument that we're going to ruin other unofficial clans is honestly a little ridiculous. Does anyone remember Bleu? Clans were thriving even though they were accepting any and all applicants, which is more than Parakeet would accept.


I'm just trying to get our point across without being rude, a lot of other Parrots feel extremely shafted because we put a lot of work into this only for it to be shut down for what some people believe is a personal beef, which I can personally attest to as a real possibility.
FIRED UP
Originally Posted by Yuma View Post
Y'all saying that Parakeet was made because Parrot wants to see a new wave of players in their group, but want to maintain the image and prestige that people associate with the clan name.

Because of this, y'all cannot just pick any random person out there, and those who join rarely fit the quota (assuming they weren't discouraged to apply at all).

Instead of relying on the current recruitment system, you folks decide to make a child clan as a way to "mold" players into what you deem fit instead of sitting there hoping someone good shows up. A mutually beneficial relationship.

A more active way of working with the community to increase your ranks w/o being saturated with crap.

Eh?

Yes and no. We aren't afraid to hide that we're pretty elitist, but you don't have to try and make us look like jerks for it. We aren't trying to mold people to our fitting, just trying to scope out any outstanding members who would otherwise be unseen. Also, Parakeets isn't totally made just to feed members into Parrot, its another separate community that we can take part in while also making sure we have at least a little bit of control who's in it, just a lot less strict as Parrot is.
Last edited by Hush; Nov 18, 2017 at 10:25 AM.
FIRED UP
i personally think the reasoning behind disallowing clans like parakeet is just. i also think toribash is not a constitutional democracy, and it shouldn't be, because it's simply a community for a company who made an online ragdoll simulation game. having the community make the rules does not work the same way it does in the real world. also polls don't really work if you're having a head start of ~50 people. using the forums as a means of feedback is ok but i personally think you could've read the rules for the staff complaints section and contacted rai first as he has ultimate responsibility over this decision, before goading the entire community against this decision.

also if parrot can have parakeet back, then TLL gets [BIG] back ok
Last edited by Slau; Nov 18, 2017 at 10:33 AM.
Originally Posted by Yuma View Post
I don't have anything to add to this thread anymore, but I stopped by to address your response and defuse some bad vibes.

No, I am not trying to make you guys look like jerks. To say people don't join clans for a sense of importance would be a lie; I have no problem with cherry picking elitists lol.

Keep the negativity astray. I am actually supportive.

I see. I assumed you meant to prove a point via bold, and it felt you were trying to paint Parrot in a negative light
FIRED UP
<Fear> whatever the intention of this clan is, in my eyes its objectively an elaborate loophole past several limitations which tthe clan system purposefully imposes
<Fear> its not against any written rules no
<Fear> that doesnt make the concept ok, 
it doesnt mean it doesn't circumvent the limitation and growth 
aspects of the toriclan system, it doesn't mean real unofficial 
clans arent gonna be squashed, it doesn't mean this isn't 
essentially a creative way to put your clan's app thread in the 
unofficial board
Actually I think quite a few people can already see this rationale, however people seem particularly annoyed that this decision came down like a ton of bricks and should have happened before Parakeet was launched, which is true and has already been apologized for, but in case you didn't read that, sorry.

Consider the position here:

If we let parakeet live, and allow feeder clans, we now have to implement a whole new set of rules relating to them, how they will work, how many you can have, what they should look like, yadda yadda. I'm confident Parrot wouldn't use an idea like this with anything except good intentions, however intentions are fleeting and there's no way I can put this in my mind which brings any benefit to anybody except the owners of the feeder clan. Is Parakeet the worst thing that ever happened to clans? Hell no. Does that mean it's ok? Also no. Bad.

If we let parakeet live but ban feeder clans, now we have a clan with an unfair gain not only over unofficial clans, but also over the other official clans too. We've made an exemption to a rule for no reason. Bad.

If he kill parakeet and ban feeder clans, now we have consistency in the enforcement of the policy and avoid the quagmire of extra rules and measurable negative impacts these types of clan would have. Should this have been dealt with better? Yes, however in my mind no staff group should ignore rules or allow the continuation of something it strongly disagrees with just for the sake of its public appearance (maybe ES needs its appearance, w/e).

There was one more point raised: we made this decision quickly. Would you rather have had parakeet running for another week before this happened? I'm very surprised this is a complaint point.
Last edited by Fear; Nov 18, 2017 at 11:54 AM.
Originally Posted by sir View Post
Some of my personal thoughts, not anyhow related to CS decisions:

Is there any good reason to have a sidekick clan apart from trying to evade the clan system limitations? Well sure, you can recruit new players more recklessly - simply because they don't wear your clan's main tag and you can always appeal to the fact that it's just a feeder clan in case they turn out to be idiots. I remember 2010's Russian clans doing that, but back then there wasn't a proper clan system yet and it was mainly done by "bigger" clans like Hack.
However, recruiting members just for the sake of getting more people doesn't seem like a good idea to me, especially for a clan that's been around for years now. Can you still get more people without the feeder clan? Sure. Yes, you'll need to take a closer look at your applicants first, but there is nothing extraordinary about it. We've raised the member cap for all clans who are at least slightly active (getting past level 10 isn't that hard, see [AS]), so it's less of an issue than it could be few months ago before the clan system update.
Having feeder clans officially allowed also poses a threat to any other legitimate unofficial clan as players may just join a child clan of an already official one rather than risk their time and TC trying to become official on their own.


To me this whole situation looks like Parrot (being one of the oldest active clans with 50% staff or ex-staff members) thought they could do anything just because they are who they are, but it turned out they can't. You still had at least 10 free spots in your clan after the clan update, go play some wars if you need more. Like seriously, you only have 66 wars and the clan has been around since the clans system was introduced. All Stars had more wars this week than you had in the last 2 years, like are you being serious? There are 9 clans founded in 2017 who were more active than Parrot, what makes your clan more special than them? (Quick tip: winning a clan event does, but not in that sense)

As far as myself, I don't see us as "special" in any means except for the fact that we are special in the case of that we are a fairly active community in a "dying game" based off of the recent amount of people playing, market activity, etc and any clan that is fairly active at the moment is special for that.

I myself don't consider any of us an elitist, but meh I'm pretty mellow and stuff lol. From what I know, we are wanting to extend our community and give more people a chance to get to know us and meet new people and make friends. That's what life is about in my opinion is to do just that, even if it may be just online.

As far as farming wars, that's a little silly. Yes, it's abusable but let's be honest. There are a lot of things still abusable to this day within Toribash itself that aren't dealt with. Even so, if it was abused it wouldn't be hard to just "delete" our progress and give us a punishment for doing so. You guys do pretty much the same thing to people who farm TC, and ranks so what's the difference with a clan?

I'm not really going to argue that much about all of it but the main reason people are "pissed" about this is that Rai did agree that we could do it, and once we posted it they shut it down.

Now it would be nice if instead of just shutting everything down and giving us the, "it's not what we thought it was going to be" speech, to work with us into molding what we created into something that would acceptable.
That's pretty much all I have to say on the topic about this whole ordeal.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[SmallBowl] [fallu] [Moop] [Parrot] [SkulFuk] [Icky] [Sassy]
[Ex-MSquad]
Need help with any market related questions? Feel free to PM ME. <Powas> I've got a degree in 1001 techniques of masturbation
No, no and no. Where is the actual proof of 'a few people can actually see this rational'? like besides tribe members and u?

There should have never been this ton of bricks, I can bet my left nut on the fact this was all crafted in the confines of (Tribe) and is just being defended by upper staff friends.

OH LOOK AT US TAKE THE MORAL HIGH GROUND if we let live and have rule if we kill and dont have rule. The whole point of the matter is that the rule was made up with no wider consent than the "CS" 3 of which are in an unofficial clan that is 'threatened' by Parakeet, yet it is also the run off 'Feeder clan' of '[NO]' and other dead clans.

if we kill now and have consistency? Are you literally that daft..this was implemented leterally within 46 hours in the confines of apparently 5 players midst...3 of which or members of a 'threaten unofficial clan' however as i point out, as you did to us... it is little more than a feeder clan for past staff and famous players. I consider this whole charade a joke.

Nabi has left this place children.


Sir also its hard to get past lvl 10 when clan system is broken. (decap have 2500 out of 1350 for lvl 11) fix it
Clan Level: 10



13800 Experience Points
2550 / 1250 XP


Will edit when less heated over this. Sorry sir, ur clan system work. Unoffic is lvl 10
Last edited by AussieCunt; Nov 18, 2017 at 02:42 PM.
[SIGPIC]http://i.imgur.com/thWfXwy.png[/SIGPIC]
Wanna see some ruffled feathers in Taekkyon


<Icky> Damn my mouth is on fire but my loins stir like the straits
Originally Posted by AussieCunt View Post
No, no and no. Where is the actual proof of 'a few people can actually see this rational'? like besides tribe members and u?

There should have never been this ton of bricks, I can bet my left nut on the fact this was all crafted in the confines of (Tribe) and is just being defended by upper staff friends.

OH LOOK AT US TAKE THE MORAL HIGH GROUND if we let live and have rule if we kill and dont have rule. The whole point of the matter is that the rule was made up with no wider consent than the "CS" 3 of which are in an unofficial clan that is 'threatened' by Parakeet, yet it is also the run off 'Feeder clan' of '[NO]' and other dead clans.

if we kill now and have consistency? Are you literally that daft..this was implemented leterally within 46 hours in the confines of apparently 5 players midst...3 of which or members of a 'threaten unofficial clan' however as i point out, as you did to us... it is little more than a feeder clan for past staff and famous players. I consider this whole charade a joke.

Nabi has left this place children.


Sir also its hard to get past lvl 10 when clan system is broken. (decap have 2500 out of 1350 for lvl 11) fix it
Clan Level: 10



13800 Experience Points
2550 / 1250 XP

You gotta chill out man. There are valid points on both sides of this debate, nobody is acting like children here. Slinging insults around both makes Parrot/Parakeet look bad and accomplishes nothing, a reasonable discussion can be had about this and if you want any chance of a resolution, the discussion has to be reasonable and not descend into insults.

My opinion is:
- War/achievement/xp farming is easily monitored (since anybody can see a clan's warring history) and can be dealt with by just making wars (official wars using the forum) between sub-clans against the rules.

- Problems with activity checks is again pretty easily avoided if the clans are considered separately and not together. Obviously I can't leak details of how the activity checks work, but in my mind this wouldn't really be an issue as long as it was clear that any activity in your child clan's thread won't be counted

- Playing twice in clan events, again, is easily avoided just by making it clear that only 1 clan in a multi-clan system can take part

- The points about getting around the membercap and an unfairly large appeal (due to being connected to a well-established clan) squashing other up-and-coming unofficial clans are both valid. Perhaps a compromise for the first could be that any child-clans have an imposed reduced membercap? With regards to the second, it's a pretty valid point.

A point that was mentioned while Parrot were discussing this was how cool it would've been when we were newly-hatched members, if there was an available path to one day get into (for example) Torigod or RAWR. We would never have thought of trying to apply to such an established clan - even though we might have been a good addition, they would have just overlooked us. That's definitely a positive effect for newer/less-known members, but whether it outweighs the negative impact it might have on other official clans (that could have recruited them) is up for debate.

For the record, I still think having child/feeder clans is a pretty arrogant thing, but that would be up to the discretion of the clan about whether they think it would positively/negatively impact their image.

@CS has it been completely decided that child-clans won't be allowed, or is there still some space for a conversation on this?
Last edited by Moop; Nov 18, 2017 at 02:55 PM.
one time i had a hair deep in my urethra and when i pulled it out it felt kinda good ~fudgiebalz 2020


<~Skul> they're not children, they're demon midgets
<~Skul> if you kill one in front of the rest, they'll scatter and leave