Toribash
Originally Posted by Micah View Post

this shit has turned into garbage



Personally I wouldn't allow anyone under 20 to smoke weed, there would be designated public places to smoke it, as well as places to buy it, safely in set amounts per week. If you want to smoke while you drive you will need to apply for a tolerance test in which experience weed smokers will judge how high you can get and still operate efficiently, but that is still iffy tbh. If youre at home smoke as much as you want


haha i like the part you say regulate it when there has never been an O/D on weed in the history of it unless accompanied by another narcotic.
No reason for regulation unless it was getting into a illegal trade which they are attempting to counter act of course. so in this case the regulations are only in the eyes of the public for voting matter of it being "safe" when the "drug" itself is already safe and has been for as long as the earth has been around. Its proven by many different researchers that marijuana actually proactively makes you more cautious and less likely to radically drive.
I as well drive blitzed every day and tbh im 22 and if i didnt smoke weed i woulda been written off the road by now. ive been in 3 accidents, each time for anger. i hadnt smoked weed until a year after my second accident. and the 3rd i wasnt driving lol

Everyone knows you cant o/d on marijuana, you can on almost anything else even water. so whats that tell you? the grandmas of this world is what we are trying to please. they hear regulation and believe it will be a better street. when the street is already filled with what is considered now crime when someone deals a fucking gram in front of retired peoples homes. yes selling legally (fuck that regulation wording is all for media) would clean up your street grandma cause no one else going to be buying it infront of your door if its legalized. and if they regulate it then people are going to have to make more trips to get the product rather than them having as much as they can purchase and making a one trip. seems counter productive dont you think?
Regulation! Right get it for those oldies that think its gonna make you jump out your window reefer madness bullshit. but once we got the votes remove that pussy "feelings" shit cause its all about everyones opinions rather than what good it would do. And sure it could affect the younger generation but thats where the only regulation part should be played in the youth of lesser than 18-20 for world wide. underdeveloped minds dont need that shit yet. This isnt an opinion, just regulation is a "Yes parents ill get A+'s on my report card for a year if you buy me an xbox!"
Its a trade.
Last edited by Mikes; Apr 24, 2018 at 10:32 PM.
"People never grow up, they just learn how to act in public."—Bryan White
I mean yeah loosen regulations in the future, but until people are not crying about it, keep the regulations until they accept it. Most of the people who do not want it legalized have never touched it anyway because "not in my good christian house" as they proceed to hate gay people lul. Either way there is no way of getting around regulations at this point and time whether we want to or not. Make them happy so we get what we want, and if that is just me having to drive 3 extra miles to go to a weed park, then fuck yes.
-----
and not regulated in a sense of how much you can smoke; Where you smoke it at.
Last edited by Micah; Apr 24, 2018 at 10:32 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Idk. Special places seems dumb...you should be able to smoke. In my country they will not legalise anytime soon but i am verry pleased that other countrys have an opened mind.
From personal example i can say that i have passed half of my life on drugs, not just weed. Now i know my substance and i am much more aware. Besides that i live a very productive and fullfilling life. Everybody should be free to make their own decission but also everybody should be informed. Young minds are easy and proned to derail. So yeah, 18 or over...even if this does nothing.
Driving might be an issue. Usually you are aware but some people can get very wasted and sick. So if u are driving and a friend lights up some rlly strong sht, you might not even notice that you cant drive anymore until to late.

My conclusion is to be responsable and everybody should make their decissions, good or bad.

Health care...fuck healthcare. At least that is what the govt ows you, after all the bullshit they do.
= SELLING MARKET INVENTORY =
Pm me for deals
Originally Posted by DarkEmber View Post
I mean, your point on reiterating the same thing several times goes both ways. You always reply that since smoking/alcohol is legal, weed should be, which I rebuked by saying that you shouldn't make it legal just because things that are worse are legal. It's bad, it should be illegal. Simple.



Not everyone who wants weed to be illegal is a staunch Christian conservative. I'm an otherwise liberal atheist, honest! ;-;

1: Im not discussing this anymore, if you don't understand that you started the shit storm that's on you.

2: it was an example

World Health Organization Document






This link lol. Darkember. You are not citing anything either. So where do you get your info? The media. Smh such hypocritical statements you make lol. Never have i ever had issue being high and driving. Helps me in my opinion.
Last edited by Mikes; Apr 27, 2018 at 06:15 AM.
"People never grow up, they just learn how to act in public."—Bryan White
Originally Posted by Mikes View Post

World Health Organization Document






This link lol. Darkember. You are not citing anything either. So where do you get your info? The media. Smh such hypocritical statements you make lol. Never have i ever had issue being high and driving. Helps me in my opinion.

I assume this wast posted in response to Darkember asking for sources.

The source you posted has a load of examples and reports on the adverse effects of cannabis. It even has this section:

4.4.1 Cannabis and driving. Cannabis impairs driving ability and confers a higher risk for motor vehicle accidents. In experimental settings, cannabis impairs psychomotor skills and cognitive functions associated with driving, including vigilance, time and distance perception, lane tracking, motor coordination, divided attention tasks, and reaction time.170 Drivers may attempt to compensate by driving more slowly and increasing their following distance. On highways, cannabis is the most frequently reported illicit drug in connection with impaired driving and accidents, including fatal accidents. In the US, (2013), 62.6% of fatally injured drivers were tested for drugs and more than one-third (34.7%) were positive for cannabis. 171 In other countries some attribute increased roadside accidents to cannabis.172,173,174,175 The use of cannabis in combination with alcohol increases the risk of impairment more than use with either drug alone as the effects were additive.176

Have you read your source?
Don't dm me pictures of bowls that you find attractive.
Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post
I assume this wast posted in response to Darkember asking for sources.

The source you posted has a load of examples and reports on the adverse effects of cannabis. It even has this section:



Have you read your source?

Lmao i will agree i went over only a little bit of it, i knew the adverse affects were likely listed, im not entirely stating that the driving aspect is true for everyone. In some cases people are anxious in traffic or in issues. i find im more calm and collected. i take time to make decisions, im more cautious, focused on what im doing i think maybe you should try it once before saying im deluded as i said IMO darkember. I think if more of our drivers were stoned there would be less road rage and people speeding off around each other hitting little kids cause there drunk. Id rather known that some one smoked a few bowls before driving than drank 4 beers. again thats my opinion as it appears you have to state that hear multiple times to separate that from factual statements. also my bad for missing your source it was hidden in text

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw1HavgoK9E

Watch this though x)

https://www.mtlblog.com/news/study-s...ility-to-drive

https://www.cnn.com/2015/06/24/polit...act/index.html

As well if you notice that a lot of research that is done is funded by big companies such as Big Pharma, Tobacco companies and alcohol companies and on the turn around are also the same companies who are funding Anti Marijuana campaigns and advertisiments. who can easily fudge the research as why would they want another big seller to put them out on sales.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/artic...ir-bottom-line
Last edited by Mikes; Apr 28, 2018 at 03:56 PM.
"People never grow up, they just learn how to act in public."—Bryan White
Originally Posted by Mikes View Post
Lmao i will agree i went over only a little bit of it, i knew the adverse affects were likely listed, im not entirely stating that the driving aspect is true for everyone. In some cases people are anxious in traffic or in issues. i find im more calm and collected. i take time to make decisions, im more cautious, focused on what im doing i think maybe you should try it once before saying im deluded as i said IMO darkember. I think if more of our drivers were stoned there would be less road rage and people speeding off around each other hitting little kids cause there drunk. Id rather known that some one smoked a few bowls before driving than drank 4 beers.

From studies conducted, including the report you linked yourself, smoking cannabis is detrimental to driving, which is why it is illegal to drive high even in places where cannabis is legal.

Whether alcohol is worse isn't relevant to whether driving high should be legal, since drunk driving is also objectively detrimental and illegal therefore a comparison isn't a relevant argument to whether driving high should be allowed.


Have you watched this? All the subjects' driving got progressively worse with cannabis smoking. The reason the limit is low is because its conservative, some people are affected more quickly than others, but for obvious reasons the law doesn't want anyone to be dangerously high while behind the wheel.

Not only does this video contradict what youre saying its also not a good study, a sample size of 3 on an experiment with so many variables is not enough to draw a meaningful conclusion.



This blog post is a heavily biased "summary" of this study. I'm going to first talk about the study then about the blog post more generally.

The study
  • The study uses a sample size of 18, this is really low for this type of study and its really difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from such a small sample size without contrasting the study to other similar studies which either agree or disagree with its conclusions. For context, commonly cited, similar studies of the effects of drugs generally have sample sizes in the hundreds or thousands; here are some reports on the effects of drinking for comparison:1 (2603 participants), 2 (2260 participants), 3 (16585 participants).
  • The study also showed that cannabis did in fact negatively affect the driving of subjects. It found that the standard deviation of lane position (shortened to SDLP in the study) increased with cannabis use. "During drive blood THC ≥8.2 μg/L increased SDLP similar to notably-impairing alcohol concentrations." It's also worth noting that the participants were people who smoked between once every three months to 3 times a week (occasional smokers) and as such will have had higher tolerance to the effects of cannabis than much of the populous, of which a notable portion do not smoke or have never smoked cannabis.
  • Again, the comparison between alcohol and cannabis isn't relevant to whether cannabis should be allowed when you're driving as alcohol is illegal when you are driving, but is relevant to the legalization of recreational cannabis use.

The Blog Post
  • In this kind of context blog posts are worth avoiding, they are by nature highly biased as it is one person's opinion rather than being an actual study.
  • "Coming out of the University of Iowa, the first study of its kind analyzed the effects of marijuana on driving performance. They found that driving under the influence of weed causes almost no impairment." Not only is this not the first study comparing the effect of marijuana on driving performance, they didn't find that driving under the influence of weed cased almost no impairment. This statement was objectively wrong on both counts.
  • "In fact, the only impairment they did find was similar to that of the legal alcohol limit for drivers." Firstly, this directly contradicts the above statement made. Secondly, the study reported that impairment was proportional to the use of marijuana, so of course at a given blood concentration (8.2 μg/L) the negative effects of marijuana were seen to be "equivalent" to the negative effects of alcohol at a specific dosage.
  • "As one would expect, impairment was found in all areas when weed was mixed with alcohol. Marijuana itself, however, showed no significant impairment to driving when taken in moderation. Some even argued that it made them drive safer and/or slower." This statement is also deliberately misleading; moderation is a subjective term, not one defined in the paper, I could argue in the same vain that alcohol when taken in moderation does not impair driving. The argument of what "moderation" is, is important to work out where to draw the legal limit but not to decide whether or not it should be legal to drive when high. The report itself at no point said that cannabis made any of the participants drive safer.

Blog posts like this are deliberately highly misleading, reading the study abstract is a better summary of what the report says than this by far. That's what the abstract is for!


I cant find the actual study that this article is about. But, again, it's about the comparison of alcohol to cannabis when driving, which isn't an argument that driving high should be legal because driving drunk is illegal so its a moot comparison. I could say that driving drunk is safer than driving while high on acid, and while probably true, it doesn't mean that driving drunk should be legal - because its dangerous.

As well if you notice that a lot of research that is done is funded by big companies such as Big Pharma, Tobacco companies and alcohol companies and on the turn around are also the same companies who are funding Anti Marijuana campaigns and advertisiments. who can easily fudge the research as why would they want another big seller to put them out on sales.

So far the reports I've looked at from this thread have been from a Havard professor, commisioned by the WHO and from the university of Iowa. Both of these reports said that cannabis had a negative effect on driving. As "cannabis impairs psychomotor skills and cognitive functions associated with driving, including vigilance, time and distance perception, lane tracking, motor coordination, divided attention tasks, and reaction time."


I'm not going to critique this one, I actually do think weed should be legal, but definitely not driving high.

I also find it interesting that in one post you say this:

So where do you get your info? The media.

And in the very next post 3 of your 4 sources are media articles, and the last one is a deliberately badly written blog post designed to be misleading.


Edit: Fixed quote bbcode
Last edited by SmallBowl; Apr 28, 2018 at 05:47 PM.
Don't dm me pictures of bowls that you find attractive.
Originally Posted by Dyspo View Post
I bet a DWI will change this opinion in a heart beat. Why risk the lives and your car because you want to "Live your life legal or not".

Also you came to discussion surprised someone actually had facts to support their opinion. That there buddy is funny af.

Yet more people drive on perscription drugs that are untested and do worse. Wjat about people perscribed marijauana if it doesnt leave body for a extended time and they need it all the time should they not be allowed to drive.....what if i was perscribed it? Would you all say nothing if i needed it say for work? Wjat abkut people who need pain pills to go to work, i know tons of people who think its perfectly fine to be slurred motion and reaction and drive. Im backing out of this convo again for the 8th time its in my opinion. Got proved wrong lol idgaf. Dont saynim suprised i wasnt lol i was saying my opinion after i got proved incorrect. Mmmkay dont be wrong holyy fuck xD

Also one of my buddies dads is the chief of police here i know him pretty well. He gets stoned before going any where. Corrupt inknow but still. Probably didnt set a good example for us as kids
Last edited by Mikes; May 5, 2018 at 03:42 AM.
"People never grow up, they just learn how to act in public."—Bryan White
Originally Posted by Mikes View Post
Yet more people drive on perscription drugs that are untested and do worse. Wjat about people perscribed marijauana if it doesnt leave body for a extended time and they need it all the time should they not be allowed to drive.....what if i was perscribed it? Would you all say nothing if i needed it say for work? Wjat abkut people who need pain pills to go to work, i know tons of people who think its perfectly fine to be slurred motion and reaction and drive. Im backing out of this convo again for the 8th time its in my opinion. Got proved wrong lol idgaf. Dont saynim suprised i wasnt lol i was saying my opinion after i got proved incorrect. Mmmkay dont be wrong holyy fuck xD

Also one of my buddies dads is the chief of police here i know him pretty well. He gets stoned before going any where. Corrupt inknow but still. Probably didnt set a good example for us as kids

Prescribed or not, they can get a DWI while under the influence of substances that can severely impair your ability to drive safely. The same way that people who experience chronic and frequent seizures aren’t allowed to drive. It isn’t fair that they cant do anything about their health issue and/or medication, but it’s whats safe for other drivers and pedestrians.