Toribash
ofc they will likely win any appeal, since swedish law makes them pretty much immune, in this case.

Personally, i think that this is more of a political issue than a legal one. They've been illegally convicted, becasue of the powerful influence of butthurt companies.

edit: Also, much lulz here (replies to legal threats)
Originally Posted by Ragdollmaster View Post
This is just corporate greed. The companies are suing because they want more money to give million dollar bonuses to their employs who do nothing- sure, what's it matter if a few people who run a website go to jail and have to pay? I love how they're not suing the people who posted up the actual torrents which broke copyright laws, but instead the guys who just set up the biggest file sharing and hosting site in the world. This is like suing e-Bay because someone on there tries to sell child porn. Well, not exactly, but you get the point.

It would cause public outrage, maybe to the point of major scale riots, or at least a lot of angry letters to the government, if the verdict stuck. Chances are it won't due to the whole immunity thing, but governments have done stupider things before.

eh, The people who run TPB knew long in advance that they were doing something that could land them in trouble. And to say that this whole issue is pinned on "corporate greed" may be a tad short sighted.

They want to stop piracy, so they take out the medium through which piracy is most heavily run. Its like when they bust drug dealers, they don't go after the little guy on the corner, but the big guy making the whole operation possible.

As for public outrage, I am fairly certain no one will care. In part do to apathy, but also and maybe more-so because no matter how you slice this, TPB is used for theft on a very large scale, and most people consider theft to be wrong enough to punish.
Organisation of Awesome: Member.
The fine is half-way understandable (they have been responsible for an awful lot of piracy, after all), but the prison sentence is over the top. I usually think of prison as being used to hold physically dangerous individuals (murderers, rapists etc), and frankly, i don't think that those four guys are any more dangerous than your average bloke. (I'm neutral about all this, mind you)
Besides, taking out the founders of any organization doesn't guarantee it being shut down.
<Blam|Homework> oiubt veubg
various places to find me lol
Originally Posted by Dalir View Post
They're not interested in stopping piracy, they're interested in punishing people for it, and now, they're trying to scare us by jailing someone because of bullshitting lawyers and a faulty court-system.

Of course they are interested in stopping piracy. I read a statistic, I will link if you need, but I have to find it again, that said the software industry alone loses something like $12 billion a year. Hell, the Adobe creative master suit alone is about $2500,and that can be downloaded and cracked in a matter of hours, by anyone smart enough to read directions.

I'm not saying this doesn't suck, but you cant look past the fact that this IS theft.
Organisation of Awesome: Member.
Originally Posted by Inzal View Post
deady you gotta remember, thats just 12 billion that they COULD make if piracy wasn't existent, and if everyone actually bought the product

its not like taking 12 billion dollars that they already have away from them... I dunno there's alot you could debate for and against piracy i suppose

You make a good point about this being a complex issue, but stealing potential funds isn't really all that different from stealing current funds. Also there is the argument that if the pirating stopped, the products wouldn't cost nearly as much...so really who knows, maybe they aren't out to kill it in the end because they make more money this way. It is complex, indeed.
Organisation of Awesome: Member.
Originally Posted by Inzal View Post
Tapion you could include it as a social issue
if you explain how a large number of people in society that use computers do piracy etc, and stuff along the lines of how it affects society and the individuals within it?

its what i would do

Yeah, and say that normal theft is something most people wouldn't do, but that just about everyone has at least one or two stolen songs. So people are able to forget the moral norm against theft because it is such a widely accepted way of doing it, even though every aspect of our socialization trains us not to do this sort of thing, we do it because we dont really believe it to be morally unsound.

If it is an essay, use lots of big vocabulary words and explain thing in depth, that what I do in my sociology class and my teacher loves my papers, even though 50% of it is filler.
Organisation of Awesome: Member.
Originally Posted by Tapion View Post
They are appealing it.....
No need to worry if they are. They appealed it at the spot.

Yeah, did anyone bother to watch the video I linked?

@Juntalis, when I said "this is theft" I was referring to things that happen through the web sight. They are providing a medium. I don't know why you cant just post without calling everyone an idiot and trying to sound like a hard ass, but maybe if you read the context you wont feel so inclined to insulting everyone, and as a result will be able to better communicate your (usually valid) points instead of pissing people off.
Organisation of Awesome: Member.
Originally Posted by War_Hero View Post
Adobe makes a shit tonne of money because of piracy. With the high price comes the belief that Photoshop is miles and miles ahead of GIMP. Because people think it is way better, they all pirate and use it, thus establishing it as the industry standard. Because it is the industry standard, schools, universities, businesses, and normal people all buy copies of it. Same foes for musicians. Many bands actually lose money on selling albums. They make their money off of concerts and other live venues where the record company(satan) is not controlling them. MIA knew that record companies screw you over, so she gave out her songs for free on napster and limewire, and now she is super popular because of it. If she had sold those same songs through a record company, they would take 90% of the profits, charge for for outlandish shit and it wouldn't even reach a wide audience.

The smart succeed in the internet age. Piracy has helped adobe and MIA and countless other achieve a wider audience for which to sell their stuff too eventually. Doom I was super easy to get for free, but ID games still made millions of dollars per person. You are not very educated in marketing or observation, Synthetic_Soul, piracy has made it very obvious that people are more willing to eventually spend more money on something they can get for free.

Wow, that's a damn good point. A friend and I were talking not too long ago about why Adobe doesn't come up with some way of making their product more difficult to crack. Not to say that it is easy, but Christ, how many Photoshops have they put out? and they still cant get around the same cracks and methods?

Anyways he suggested that maybe they do it so that the people who use it as a hobby, but may one day pursue a career that involves the product, will only know how to work with Adobe products, therefor making them a necessary part of business and allowing them to charge higher prices.
Organisation of Awesome: Member.