Toribash
Well yea for sure it won't come to an end, I myself am 'unharmfully' racist to my mates of colour and I unfortunetly see it as funny and so do they. But atleast this can maybe tone down the hate that is around a lot to do with race. But even saying this I get triggered at Asians swarming my country. It's going to be a hard thing to do but atleast there's a decent amount of awareness coming out of this. Obviously the riots aren't good but typical MURICA
-----
Oops is that racist
Last edited by JoboMan; Jun 2, 2020 at 08:40 PM. Reason: <24 hour edit/bump
Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
I'm not really sure what question is being asked by the OP, but regarding George Floyd, he was a criminal convicted of numerous drug charges, for invading a woman's home with 5 others and pointing a gun at her. This was a deeply messed-up individual, and should not be portrayed as a martyr by any movement or person.

No one said he was a perfect person, his needless death served as the umpteenth reminder that black people are being treated unfairly in the US.


Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
As for the idea that there is systemic racism in America, it is a loosely defined statement that requires proof and evidence. I haven't seen that proof


Gonna go out on a limb and say you're not looking for it.
alright guy
Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
The point was that a dangerous person is more likely to end up in a situation where he's killed by a police officer. This goes against the narrative that police are actively out-to-get black people.

He wasn't doing anything dangerous before he got executed
He served jail time for his crimes
A bad thing happening to a bad person* is still a bad thing happening to a person
*debatable if Floyd was at the time of his death, people can change

Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
Unfair assumption, you don't know me.

If you are looking and you say you haven't found anything, you're either blind, willfully ignorant, or completely dishonest.

Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
It's all well-and-good sending me links - and I appreciate the effort - but what I'm after is evidence that systemic racism exists in your words. Feel free to quote others, but I don't have the time to read a bunch of books to get to the point. If it's so obvious that systemic racism exists, then it should be easy to explain to someone, like me, who is presently unconvinced.

"Systemic" implies a whole bunch of things. Where's the institutional and systematic racism in America? Can you point to any institutions?


Vaush (the 34 minute video guy) has a document with a sort of cliff notes version of why institutional racism is a real thing. The section that talks about it is credited to Rose Wrist. Links to sources are above the conclusions drawn from them.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...rE/mobilebasic

Some highlights:

Originally Posted by Racial bias in the justice system
Studies seem to indicate about 61-80% of black overrepresentation in prisons can be explained by higher black crime rates, with the unexplained portion largely attributable to racial bias.
Remember - the factors which lead to disproportionate criminality amongst black Americans are also in large part a product of racial bias. Underfunded public programs, redlining, generational poverty, bad schooling, and myriad other factors which influence criminality can also be traced to racial bias.

Originally Posted by Drug imprisonment and race
While White & Black Americans admit to using and selling illicit drugs at similar rates, Black Americans are VASTLY more likely to go to prison for a drug offense.
In 2002, Black Americans were incarcerated for drug offenses at TEN TIMES the rate of White Americans.
Today, Blacks are 3.7x as likely to be arrested for a marijuana offense as Whites, despite similar usage.
97% of “large-population counties” have racial biases in their drug offense incarceration.

Originally Posted by Nationwide traffic stops
Analysis finds the bar for searching black and hispanic drivers’ cars is significantly lower than the bar for white drivers.
Additionally, black drivers are less likely to be pulled over after sunset, when “a ‘veil of darkness’ masks ones’ race”.

Originally Posted by Sentencing disparities
Extensive multivariate regression analysis indicates black male offenders receive 19.1% longer federal sentences than similarly-situated white male offenders (white male offenders with similar past offenses, socioeconomic background, etc.)
This disparity seems to stem mostly from black males being 21.2% less likely to receive non-government sponsored downward departures or variances.
Non-government sponsored departures and variances refer to deviations from standard sentencing guidelines due to judicial discretion.
Black males who do receive non government-sponsored departures and variations still serve 16.8% longer sentences than white males on average.
In contrast, when sentencing length follows standard guidelines, that disparity is only 7.9%, and a substantial assistance departure for both groups nullifies that disparity.
IN SUMMARY - much of the sentencing disparity between similarly situated black males and white males comes down to judicial discretion to deviate from standard sentencing guidelines.
BONUS - regression analysis suggests violence in a criminal’s history does NOT explain sentencing disparities between black males and similarly situated white males - the effect of that factor seems to be statistically insignificant.

Originally Posted by Death penalty and race
Analysis of 33 years of data from Washington State to determine which characteristics best predict the decision to implement a death sentence.
Black defendants are 4.5 times as likely to receive a death sentence as similarly-situated whites.
Other factors (presence of aggravating circumstances, involvement of sex crimes, hostage-taking, etc.) explain only a small fraction of the disparity in prosecutors’ and juries’ decision to invoke the death penalty against black defendents.
Race was by far the most influential statistical factor.

Originally Posted by Implicit bias in larger society
Results from three separate studies on perception and racial bias show people have a tendency to perceive black men as larger and more threatening than similarly sized white men.
Participants also believed the black men were more capable of causing harm in a hypothetical altercation and police would be more justified in using force to subdue them, even if the men were unarmed.

I hope that helps.
alright guy
Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
The man was arrested for using a fake $20 dollar bill. He also had 19 nanograms of meth in his system, and 2.9 nanograms of THC, a psychocative ingredient found in marijuana. So I doubt he changed much - if at all.

He was suspected of using counterfeit money and as far as I'm aware the public doesn't know if he actually was. Let's save our stances on drugs for another thread.

Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
Of course, this doesn't justify killing him.


Following you.


Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
My point is that bad people - which George Floyd clearly seemed to be - are more likely to end up in situations like this.


But you said this


Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
Of course, this doesn't justify killing him.


The whole issue is the fact that he was killed




Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
Wouldn't the systemic racism narrative have more impact in being applied to a more innocent black person rather than a drugged-up criminal like George Floyd?


There are plenty of examples of fully innocent black people getting shot to death (Tonakai mentioned their situations, names are Stephon Clark and Breonna Taylor), Floyd was the latest in a long line of blacks that received unjust excessive force from police officers.


I think the reason why this situation in particular garnered more outrage than the others was because people had nothing to do during quarantine, so instead of working with the injustice in the back of their minds, they protested because they had nothing better to do. This is just conjecture and might be insensitive towards the movement. Tell me how I'm wrong if I am. Maybe that came off as arrogant. Shit.

Originally Posted by Mallymkun View Post
I can only choose out of those three? No fair!


Okay, a fourth one: you're not looking in the right places. (It's just a joke, please don't start a debate on who determines what the 'right places' are)
alright guy
Originally Posted by Thorn View Post
the nature of floyd's character is irrelevant; the protests are not about him specifically and I think that's very obvious

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests


Originally Posted by Thorn View Post
and arguing about floyd's nature to discredit the movement is myopic and immature

The death itself was fucked up and the cop should definitely be tried for murder. But if I remember correctly, right when George Floyd was murdered all the headlines were like 'White Cop murders Black Man' and the media was automatically trying to pin the murder as a hate-crime, meanwhile the newly released Body-Cam footage pretty much shows it was never about race, and in my opinion this makes all the rioting even more silly.



Remember this? Still think they are going to do it ?

https://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/George-Floyd-will-tour-the-South-in-hologram-15443773.php
Last edited by McFarbo; Aug 6, 2020 at 04:03 AM.
Originally Posted by gunop View Post
I don't think the killing wasn't racially motivated.

Maybe not. We can't know. Doesn't make systemic racism any less of a problem.

Originally Posted by gunop View Post
The new footage combined with prior evidence shows that he was on just about every drug and clearly wasn't cooperating.

This isn't grounds for an execution.

Originally Posted by gunop View Post
Particularly he had enough fentanyl for it to be lethal. One of the symptoms it causes is trouble breathing. He even tested positive for COVID for god's sake.

The autopsy report said the reason he died was the pressure being exerted on his neck for 8 minutes.

Originally Posted by gunop View Post
Even besides that it's unacceptable how the media twisted it.

I can't really speak to media coverage as I'm not from the US, but I am curious to know what you think was twisted.

Originally Posted by gunop View Post
It's disappointing that this months old information is only coming to light with the recently leaked footage.

The toxicology report was available as a part of the autopsy report?

Originally Posted by gunop View Post
And above all, the fact that he was saying "I can't breathe" before he was on the ground is just the ultimate mockery. The body cam footage doesn't even extend to the point where he was on the ground, so we still don't even know everything that went on.

You just said fentanyl can cause trouble breathing. It could have been entirely factual. That doesn't even matter though, as it's not fucking grounds for an execution. There's also plenty of bystander videos that show what happens after.

Originally Posted by gunop View Post
Systemic racism is a real issue and the fight for equality is the one good thing to come out of Floyd's death. However after all the looting and hate for the police it's hard to say if it will even net a positive outcome. People not realizing that violence is cylical is one of the greatest pitfalls of humanity. To quote Martin Luther King: "Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral"

Looting isn't part of the movement.

I agree that hating all police and being violent isn't super helpful, but from what I've heard there have been plenty of peaceful protests but nothing has changed. I don't see many options for the protesters but to escalate if there is to be significant change.

Originally Posted by gunop View Post
It's late at night and I'll probably edit this later. Just an hour ago I thought his death was completely unacceptable, but after reading about all this new info I have to get this out before I go to bed.

Are you seriously saying his death is acceptable after seeing the footage and finding out about his drug usage?

Derek Chauvin was charged with second degree murder. The court had access to all of the information that the public has, and more. The court finds the death unacceptable.
Last edited by fudgiebalz; Aug 9, 2020 at 07:58 PM.
alright guy
@Tonakai, what do you imagine will happen if the police are defunded (as you want)? What do you think law and order and justice will look like?
Originally Posted by Ele View Post
@Tonakai, what do you imagine will happen if the police are defunded (as you want)? What do you think law and order and justice will look like?

I can answer this,Imagine you have a domestic dispute and are yelling at your wife, a neighbor calls a noise complaint in and a social worker arrives and provides you counseling on the spot, you feel rehabilitated and no longer have the need to yell at your wife. Today what happens is you spend a night in jail and you get a criminal record. Congrats.


The money that was used for militarization of the police is now transferred to providing healthcare for the junkies they keep throwing in prison who then get more drugs there instead of getting off drugs.


Defunding the police looks like Britain and Sweden, you don't need a police man to tell you not to do drugs, you don't need a police man to have an automatic rifle and shoot 300 bullets and miss every single one and hit innocent bystanders that were driving in a high-speed marijuana possession chase.




You don't need a policeman to jail a criminal that robbed you, you just need your money and your stuff back, like I give a fuck about some mugger taking 300 bucks from my wallet, mugger don't need 300 bucks he needs a career and way to pay for living, I need my 300 bucks. Today all I get is that guy goes to prison for 3 years I have to pay for his stay with my tax money and I am out 300 bucks nobody will ever give me that money back, good luck suing the broke dude that robbed you.




The solution is not more money for police, its to get to the core of why the crime happened and prevent it. Reroute the money to that.
🫷🦚🫸
I think people on the left have an unmatched propensity for creating and latching onto vague and divisive political slogans. "Defund the police" is the latest example, as the more rational will explain that it doesn't mean what the words mean. Other examples are Believe All Women, and ACAB. This kind of rhetoric stands opposite to productive discussion. Ironically, calling it out does (Catch twenty-)too.

I think we can all agree that police departments shouldn't be getting leftover military equipment for free or at reduced prices. That kind of stuff should be reserved for the special units. I don't actually know how much of their budget is spent on unnecessary stuff like this, though. I tried looking it up, but just kept getting numbers on the police budget as a percentage of city/state spending. If it is a significant portion then yeah, pump that stuff into preventative measures. But I honestly doubt that it is a significant portion.

The world needs police. But police also need to be accountable. Police unions are very good at representing their officers, at times to the detriment of justice. Laws like qualified immunity to set unreasonably high bars for prosecuting police officers are just bad.

I admit that I haven't been looking, but I've yet to see a good example for a situation where we would normally call police officers that shouldn't require police officers. The domestic violence one sirkill1 mentioned seems especially weird to me, as they can easily get violent.

From what I've seen, police spending is a not insignificant factor in the reduction of crime.


Right now, it just doesn't seem like the answer to me.
Last edited by fudgiebalz; Aug 10, 2020 at 06:35 PM.
alright guy
Originally Posted by fudgiebalz View Post


Right now, it just doesn't seem like the answer to me.

The pro-arrest program did not generally increase victim reporting to or satisfaction with police, but it made women more reluctant to seek state intervention. Women were right to worry that calling the cops would result in their partners’ incarceration, job loss, or deportation, or even the woman’s own arrest. Research in California revealed that the adoption of mandatory arrest policies increased arrests of men by 60 percent and arrests of women by 400 percent. The primary deterrent effect of arrest policies, it appears, was deterring womenfrom calling for help. And this may have had deadly consequences. A 2007 study that compared domestic homicide rates among states with and without mandatory arrest laws and within states before and after such laws found that the laws corresponded to a “54 percent increase in intimate partner homicides.” The author hypothesized that arrest had deterred at-risk women from seeking help.
The domestic violence law enforcement program was costly in other ways. Armed policing comes at a steep human cost. Take, for example, Derek Chauvin, the officer who killed George Floyd. In 2008, he responded to a domestic violence call, busted down the door of a bathroom where Ira Toles was hiding, and shot Tolles twice in the stomach. Chauvin claimed the unarmed Toles reached for his police gun. Toles told the Daily Beast that he remembered Chauvin breaking in and beating him but not being shot. But, he added, “I remember my baby mother screaming and crying.” Policing this domestic violence incident traumatized the victim, left Toles with holes in his stomach and a misdemeanor conviction, and garnered Chauvin a medal of valor.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/slate.c...ce-history.amp




Interesting read, long story short no. Police should not be responding to domestic violence calls.
Last edited by sir; Aug 11, 2020 at 07:08 AM. Reason: Fixed font color
🫷🦚🫸