"Most people around the world are suffering in some way; because you suffer too does that give you the right to gun down 12 people?"

I agree with you, but that don't change the fact I can't be happy because someone is murdered.

"Nothing was done to them personally; they took a satiristic cartoon the wrong way. Either way, all around the world; murder of innocents is illegal. It's irrelevant if you feel someone insulted your religion, that doesn't give you the right to murder.
The magazine in question also took stabs at other religions but you don't see anyone from those murdering them."

Do you really think they did that only because of these satiric cartoons ? Really ? Don't you think it is a "message" they give about something bigger ?

You see Mocucha, how many times has someone talked shit to you? I'm going to guess quite a lot. How many of them did you shoot? Gonna go on a wild hunch and say none.

Just because someone is thin skinned doesn't justify actions they've taken.
If they didn't kill 12 people because of what Charlie Hebdo illustrated what else could it be? I see no other motives other than a satiric cartoon or because they wanted to prove a point.

Both seem pointless to me and considered killing an innocent person which stands against the religion they were 'supposedly' fighting for.

For your first question : I bet not more than you. For your second question : Don't act like you know me.

Now I have a question : Why do you personaly attack me because I say I can't be happy because a human is murdered (for any reason) and because I think they didn't do that just because of the cartoons ?

For that part :"Just because someone is thin skinned doesn't justify actions they've taken.
If they didn't kill 12 people because of what Charlie Hebdo illustrated what else could it be? I see no other motives other than a satiric cartoon or because they wanted to prove a point.

Both seem pointless to me and considered killing an innocent person which stands against the religion they were 'supposedly' fighting for."

I'm sorry, my english is bad and I'm not sure to understand what you are saying even google traduction.

nope it's not.

Some people (including a famous comedian/polemicist) faces judicial charges for speaking their minds about all that affair, and not necessarily in an apologetic manner for terrorism.

That's the fun part of France : we cri evritime for liberty of expression, but it's not a total liberty of expression like the USA's one. So in our actual globalised world a lot of people are confused about what liberty of expression is in France.

I wish we had a total liberty of expression.