Toribash
Originally Posted by cowmeat View Post
Well I think I phrased it a bit poorly, I did not mean you have to believe everything in quran literally, but that you have to believe that quran is the word of god, otherwise you cant be a muslim (that being the literal definition of a muslim).

What I meant there was taking everything in the Qu'ran entirely literally, which you dont have to to be a Muslim

So I don't think you have to be a fundamentalist to be a muslim, that misunderstanding was due to my poor phrasing. But I still think even if you don't believe everything the quran says literally, if the word of your god says that homosexuality is bad, it will have a negative impact on your behaviour. For the same reason, homophobia is more noticeable in christian communities than in secular ones. What the quran says, even if you dont accept everything literally, will influence you since you still believe its divine.

Thats what I meant. Sorry for that poor phrasing.

This we can agree on, many religions are certainly oppressive towards people who are homosexual, I do think the religion is partly to blame - but at the same time there are Christians and people of other religions who are not against homosexuality, so even here I believe the person is more important than the religion and it is certainly true that some branches of every religion are more accepting of homosexuality than others. As a side note - being against gay marriage doesnt necessarily make you against homosexuality either.


But all this comes back to the point, that this way I can still generalize a concept of islam that is not contradictory. It's based on the belief that quran is divine and thus what the quran says is highly influental. Not to be mistaken with fundamentalism.


Ps. Fixed that literally part of the previous post, read it again.

This is all true, but, in the case in point of Omar Mateen - it is safe to say most Muslim teachings, particularly in Western society would not inspire this act which is why I think in cases like this it is important to give the branch of Islam he is acting from. Would you agree with this?




Another thing, its come through the news today from the nightclub that "Omar Mateen has been in the nightclub at least a dozen times before so it is almost certain that he had other motives for what he did".
Don't dm me pictures of bowls that you find attractive.
Not immediately relevant to the discussion of this thread, but I found this article to be an interesting bit of information for you all to chew on:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/report...222620444.html

There are a lot of angles to consider here, and I don't pretend to know the shooter's motives or even how to fix the problem for the future. As a bisexual man, I can relate to how this man had an inner conflict between family, social obligations, religion, and sexual orientation that led to a bad mental state and thus to horrible actions. I think this proves that lgbt issues are not over with yet, similar to how racial issues are not even close to completely resolved at this point.

I don't want to try to convince you of anything, because I'm not convinced of anything and I'm stupid and basically all of us have no idea what we're talking about. I just think this is important to consider.
[12:00] <fudgiebalz> toribash SUCKS
Check my ~~~Dank Replays~~~
Reports said that he called 911, and told them that he was pledging to Allah, and that he understood why people that have done these things before, like the Boston Marathon Bombing, 9/11, Sandy Hook, Columbine, etc. Even though not all of these were done by Islamic Extremists, it is very unsettling.

Thank you for sharing that Larfen, my aunt spoke with me about that this morning, but didn't get to finding an article until now.

Now, I am one for making guns, preferably semi automatics, or just weapons like the AR-15. There is no reason to have guns like those to be held by citizens. Unless they've served in the military and it's theirs, but still, no need really.

When I speak of Gun Control, I don't mean the restriction of weapons all over, just the ability to gain them legally and what kinds of guns are allowed needs to be changed.


I've been away for a bit, so I didn't get to reading everything. So I apologize if any of this has been spoken of already or not part of anything.

"Dear reader, I hope this email finds you before I do."
@Grohen

In addition to what Oracle said, you also conflated gun laws with other very significant factors like socioeconomic factors and family related instability like divorce and fatherlessness, all of which tend to have a positive correlation with violent crime.
Originally Posted by SmallBowl View Post


This is all true, but, in the case in point of Omar Mateen - it is safe to say most Muslim teachings, particularly in Western society would not inspire this act which is why I think in cases like this it is important to give the branch of Islam he is acting from. Would you agree with this?




Another thing, its come through the news today from the nightclub that "Omar Mateen has been in the nightclub at least a dozen times before so it is almost certain that he had other motives for what he did".


I'm not so sure I would agree with that.

I don't see the rhetoric of western islam being not also at fault here. Let's not forget that in the UK, arguably where the most western islam can be found, over half of the muslim population would want to outlaw homosexuality entirely. And on top of that only 18% percent found homosexuality somewhat acceptable. So in the light of these grim statistics, preaching the harmfulness of western islam feels pretty dishonest. If most of your peers want to outlaw homosexuality, being a troubled closet homosexual yourself, I can't imagine it doing much good for your psyche.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ity-sharia-law

This person was clearly tormented by his homosexuality and his religion not being compatible with one another. Obviously for a sane person that wouldn't cause such acts to occur, but can I say that westernized islam is not also at fault? Not if I'm being honest to myself.
Surely the extremist fundamental wing will inspire more of these acts than the more modern moderate wing, but I wouldn't still regard them even remotely as a force for good.


Yet again, may it be inspired by the extremist wing or not, the cause is clearly an islamic problem in general. Not just the fundamental wing.
So in conclusion, I will hold all of islam somewhat accountable for such acts, not equally, but still relevantly.
Last edited by cowmeat; Jun 14, 2016 at 10:18 PM.
Islam is a violent and barbaric fairy tale that Arabs use to justify their backwardness. It's basically the modern-day iteration of the worst things Christianity had to offer a thousand years ago. Islam is bad, the people who practice it can't think for themselves and some of them do horrible things because the 'great goat f*cker in the sky' told them to.

Also, notice how most of humanities suffering in the past 100 years were due to people taking beliefs and ideologies to the extreme. Nazism, Communism and Islam were/are the main reason people died in this and the previous century. (The exception would be Imperialism, but that's just greed and it is a part of human nature. I guess we'll always be dying because of that.)
Last edited by Ele; Jun 15, 2016 at 02:05 AM. Reason: -snip-
It could be said that fundamentalists of both religions subscribe to the most literal interpretation of their scriptures. They aren't the only ones 'actually following' it, they're just the only ones following it in the most literal, fundamental way. Other people follow in other ways. There's pluralism in religion - multiple ways to follow the same faith.

Problem is that within some religions there are sects that deny other sects the right to practice their interpretation - Exclusivist sects. Some sects are very aggressive in their denial. Sects like ISIS.

Nobody can say that ISIS aren't really Islamic. They've got their own interpretation of the scripture. It may be a shit and destructive reading of the scripture, but it's still a reading.
Originally Posted by Risk View Post
Nobody is concluding that Islam is evil based on the actions of one man. People are concluding that Islam is evil based on the fact that it has thousands of followers who literally want the death of all non-believers, and millions more who actively discriminate against and persecute women and gays. Sure, there are peaceful practitioners of the religion, especially in the Western world, and I'm not trying to discredit and of them, but the overwhelming majority of Muslims worldwide are prejudiced and hateful, and it shows.

I don't believe in justifying actions we don't understand as wrong. These guys are just as human as us, but they don't interpret right from wrong the same way. The words prejudiced and hateful don't reflect the true nature of their actions imo. Also, about christains having some benift... ...the only reason we were able to switch freaking testaments is because we weren't as bound to religion as we once were. It has nothing to do with the type of religion wtf. However, I do agree it was unfortunate how the terrorits "holy book" was written.

Meh, but away from morals, orlando shooting.. Now, instead of calling this a gun violence, they are calling it "terrorism" which is actualy not very accurate. The reason being; terrorists are (typically) described as people from another country inflicting organized terror on a nation. Terrorism also means "this guy isn't getting any trials or anything of the sort, burn'em". The act displayed in Orlando was some fat, American, religious idiot who somehow got to kill FIFTY people without getting totaly recked. There was no organization or anything like that for the most part, but you know, for all the talk about "guns don't kill people, people kill people", I have to admit, guns help a whole hell of a lot. Guns can be made from virtually anything. Instead of focusing on banning guns or not, we should come up with a strategic way to get rid of them perhaps without outlawing them.
Last edited by WAPOW; Jun 15, 2016 at 04:09 AM.
Chickster: I literally don't know why I did it.
Originally Posted by Link View Post
I don't believe in justifying actions we don't understand as wrong. These guys are just as human as us, but they don't interpret right from wrong the same way. The words prejudiced and hateful don't reflect the true nature of their actions imo. Also, about christains having some benift... ...the only reason we were able to switch freaking testaments is because we weren't as bound to religion as we once were. It has nothing to do with the type of religion wtf. However, I do agree it was unfortunate how the terrorits "holy book" was written.


And why is that they have a different kind of a moral code? Could it be because of this religions overarching effect on their entire lives? Could it be because this religion is always infallible, so it's harder to adopt modern values of morality and freedom?
We can pretty much date our western morals back to christianity, the enlightenment and the secular humanistic movement. We have pretty much taken the good parts of christianity into our moral code and replaced the bad.

You can start the whole "WELL WHAT ARE MORALS ANYWAYS" but that wont get us anywhere.

What kind of religion it is totally does matter, islam is the worst kind of religion when it comes to reform. As stated earlier and widely accepted as the definition of being a muslim, you have to believe the quran to be he divine word of god, infallible.
The difference between christianity and islam is that even if the bible is holy, it is not infallible in the same sense. Fundamentalism built into the basic structures of a religion will create more extremism and a more rigid framework to improve said religion on.

This we can see easily in the west. Second and third generation western muslims might be more westernized than say saudi muslims, but polls and studies still suggest a heavy conservatism, sexism and homophobia among the muslim youth when compared to the secular, or even christian youth. When ideologies clash, and one of the ideologies will have to be accepted as infallible, growth as a culture, not to speak of an individual, is slower and more rigid. This is why religion matters, christianity has always been more fluid and addaptive than islam, thanks to how quran is perceived in islam.

The kind of religion truly matters.
Either you accept that this specific faith has corrupted numerous people into thinking in fundamentalist rhetoric and committing acts in the name of their imaginary friend, or you have to give some other explanation for such acts and way of thinking. I find it hard to believe you can come up with an explanation entirely separated from islam. Surely, islam exclusively will hardly create all this evil we see, but it a great fuel to the flames of bigotry and hate.


Dodging the religious aspect of these crimes and not focusing on the core beliefs that fuel these horrible acts is not helpful.
Blaming gun control (as much as I agree that guns are not good for a civilian to have) is like blaming pollution on oil and not the company spilling it.

Any and all ideologies can be used to fuel the flames of violence. Islam just happens to be the rocket fuel of ideologies.
Last edited by cowmeat; Jun 15, 2016 at 04:55 AM.
Originally Posted by Risk View Post
You know, I will concede that "hateful" is the wrong term, because they do honestly believe that what they're doing is right. The ones who honestly believe they're doing the right thing aren't even "evil" or "bad" people, even if the actions themselves are abhorrent. That still doesn't make any of it acceptable in a modern society, though.

Hitler was an okay guy then. We all stand corrected.

This whole Islam vs the world stuff is just evil people doing evil things following an evil ideology. You can't behead/burn/crush/drown/shoot/explode people and be an okay guy at the end of the day.
Last edited by Ele; Jun 15, 2016 at 08:55 AM. Reason: -snip-